Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Validation of the Brief Assessment of Stress and Eating (BASE) in cisgender gay men and lesbian women

  • Jason M. Nagata
  • , Christopher D. Otmar
  • , Ken Murakami
  • , Char Potes
  • , Jason M. Lavender
  • , Emilio J. Compte
  • , Tiffany A. Brown
  • , Kelsie T. Forbush
  • , Annesa Flentje
  • , Juno Obedin-Maliver
  • , Mitchell R. Lunn

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo › revisión exhaustiva

Resumen

Background: Sexual minority adults are at elevated risk for eating disorders (EDs), yet existing screening tools have rarely been validated in this population. Most ED screening instruments have been validated in predominately cisgender, heterosexual female samples limiting their generalizability to populations with different symptom patterns. Validation studies in cisgender sexual minority (SM) adults are critical to improving detection and addressing disparities in ED identification. The present study evaluated the psychometric performance of the Brief Assessment of Stress and Eating (BASE), a validated 10-item screening tool that assesses DSM-5-aligned eating disorder symptoms and subclinical dysregulated eating behaviors, in a national sample of cisgender gay men and lesbian women. Methods: Participants were 1,499 cisgender SM adults (61.7% gay men, 38.3% lesbian women) recruited from The PRIDE Study, a U.S.-based longitudinal cohort of sexual and gender minority adults. Respondents completed the BASE, SCOFF questionnaire, and the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale-5 (EDDS-5) which we used to derive probable DSM-5 eating disorder (probable ED) status. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision–recall (PR) curve analyses were conducted to evaluate classification accuracy and identify optimal thresholds. Results: Both the BASE and SCOFF performed significantly above chance in detecting EDDS-5-derived probable EDs. Among gay men, the BASE (AUC: ROC = 0.785, PRC = 0.702) outperformed the SCOFF (ROC = 0.744, PRC = 0.630). In lesbian women, the two screeners performed similarly (BASE AUC = 0.807; SCOFF AUC = 0.806). Optimal BASE thresholds varied by group with higher sensitivity at lower cutoffs (e.g., ≥ 7). Conclusions: The BASE provides a reliable, efficient alternative to traditional instruments for screening eating disorders in sexual minority adults, with good performance for identifying EDDS-5–derived probable EDs. Findings support the BASE as a reliable and valid screening tool for use with cisgender SM adults in community, healthcare, and research contexts.

Idioma originalInglés
Número de artículo28
PublicaciónJournal of Eating Disorders
Volumen14
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublicada - dic 2026

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

  1. ODS 3: Salud y bienestar
    ODS 3: Salud y bienestar

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Validation of the Brief Assessment of Stress and Eating (BASE) in cisgender gay men and lesbian women'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto