TY - JOUR
T1 - Using small businesses for individual tax planning
T2 - evidence from special tax regimes in Chile
AU - Agostini, Claudio A.
AU - Engel, Eduardo
AU - Repetto, Andrea
AU - Vergara, Damián
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We thank Chile’s Ministry of Finance and Chile’s tax authority, Servicio de Impuestos Internos (SII), for access to the data used in this paper, and Paula Benavides, Conrado Canales, Pamela Castellón, Boris González, Francisco Henríquez, Sandra Luckheide, Eduardo Pantoja and Carlos Recabarren for their help in its analysis. We have benefited from the insights of two anonymous referees, and of Anh Pham, Bibek Adhikari, and seminar audiences at the University of Michigan, the 73rd IIPF Annual Congress, the 110th NTA Annual Conference on Taxation and the 2017 SECHI Annual Meetings. Agostini, Repetto and Vergara acknowledge financial support from CONICYT (DPI20140108). The data provided by the SII’s Division of Studies come from individual self-reports and therefore represent only an approximation to actual data. The SII does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the data, nor guarantees its validity or integrity. The responsibility for the analysis and conclusions in this paper lies solely with the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the Chilean tax administration.
Funding Information:
We thank Chile?s Ministry of Finance and Chile?s tax authority, Servicio de Impuestos Internos (SII), for access to the data used in this paper, and Paula Benavides, Conrado Canales, Pamela Castell?n, Boris Gonz?lez, Francisco Henr?quez, Sandra Luckheide, Eduardo Pantoja and Carlos Recabarren for their help in its analysis. We have benefited from the insights of two anonymous referees, and of Anh Pham, Bibek Adhikari, and seminar audiences at the University of Michigan, the 73rd IIPF Annual Congress, the 110th NTA Annual Conference on Taxation and the 2017 SECHI Annual Meetings. Agostini, Repetto and Vergara acknowledge financial support from CONICYT (DPI20140108). The data provided by the SII?s Division of Studies come from individual self-reports and therefore represent only an approximation to actual data. The SII does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the data, nor guarantees its validity or integrity. The responsibility for the analysis and conclusions in this paper lies solely with the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the Chilean tax administration.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - Many countries have special tax regimes (STRs) for small businesses. Even though these regimes may reduce compliance costs, they increase the complexity of the tax system and can be used by high-income individuals to avoid taxes. This paper uses administrative data from Chile to analyze whether the use of STRs is associated with strategic tax planning at the individual level. A descriptive analysis of the data finds three stylized facts that, taken together, are consistent with strategic behavior: STRs are used frequently, they are used mainly by high-income taxpayers, and high-income taxpayers are more likely to hold a portfolio of businesses filing taxes under STRs. We rationalize these facts with a simple model of small business creation and tax planning and test the model’s predictions. We find that following a reform that made a particular STR more restrictive, reported individual incomes from businesses filing under that STR decreased between 10 and 15%, while income reported from alternative sources increased. Overall Taxable Income increased between 4 and 7%. This increase is explained by the more restrictive scenario for avoiding taxes through STRs, consistent with individuals using these regimes for tax planning.
AB - Many countries have special tax regimes (STRs) for small businesses. Even though these regimes may reduce compliance costs, they increase the complexity of the tax system and can be used by high-income individuals to avoid taxes. This paper uses administrative data from Chile to analyze whether the use of STRs is associated with strategic tax planning at the individual level. A descriptive analysis of the data finds three stylized facts that, taken together, are consistent with strategic behavior: STRs are used frequently, they are used mainly by high-income taxpayers, and high-income taxpayers are more likely to hold a portfolio of businesses filing taxes under STRs. We rationalize these facts with a simple model of small business creation and tax planning and test the model’s predictions. We find that following a reform that made a particular STR more restrictive, reported individual incomes from businesses filing under that STR decreased between 10 and 15%, while income reported from alternative sources increased. Overall Taxable Income increased between 4 and 7%. This increase is explained by the more restrictive scenario for avoiding taxes through STRs, consistent with individuals using these regimes for tax planning.
KW - Behavioral responses
KW - Income sheltering
KW - Individual tax planning
KW - Small businesses
KW - Special tax regimes
KW - Tax avoidance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052115375&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10797-018-9509-0
DO - 10.1007/s10797-018-9509-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052115375
SN - 0927-5940
VL - 25
SP - 1449
EP - 1489
JO - International Tax and Public Finance
JF - International Tax and Public Finance
IS - 6
ER -