TY - JOUR
T1 - Teleneuropsychology in Latin America
T2 - Experiences and challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic
AU - Vera, Loreto Olavarria
AU - Dechent, Claudia
AU - Parra Rodriguez, Mario
AU - Crivelli, Lucía
AU - Capuñay, Nilton Santos Custodio
AU - Brucki, Sonia Maria Dozzi
AU - Okada-Oliveira, Maira
AU - Robert, Phillip
AU - Quiroz, Yakeel T.
AU - Antivilo-Bruna, Andres
AU - Ramirez, Alejandra Arboleda
AU - Lillo, Patricia
AU - Carello, María Agostina
AU - Torralva, Teresa
AU - Ramos, Teresita
AU - Duran-Aniotz, Claudia
AU - Allegri, Ricardo
AU - Slachevsky, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026, Associacao Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) to deliver remote neuropsychological services in settings with limited clinic access. Objective: To examine TeleNP practices in Latin America (LA), focusing on clinicians’ perceptions of utility, validity, and barriers. Methods: A descriptive, exploratory cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2020 and January 2021 among health professionals practicing neuropsychology in LA. The instrument, validated through a Delphi process, assessed professional background, TeleNP use, patient profiles, applied tests, and perceived advantages and challenges. Results: A total of 212 clinicians from 10 countries participated (mean age and clinical experience=42.7 years and 12.3 years, respectively). Participants were primarily psychologists (75.9%), but also neurologists, geriatricians, psychiatrists and speech-language pathologists. TeleNP adoption rose from 4.2% regular and 13.7% occasional pre-pandemic use to 58% at the time of the survey, with significant cross-country variation (χ2=79.0, df=30, p<0.001). TeleNP was used mainly for patient (90%) and informant (89.5%) interviews, screening (71.8%), and, in half of the cases, more extensive assessments. The advantages reported were improved access (81.5%), reduced transportation costs (79.8%), patient comfort (66.1%), and easier scheduling (66.1%). The main barrier identified was limited patient connectivity (84.7%). Regulatory knowledge was heterogeneous: 36.7% reported TeleNP authorization in their country, 23.5% reported no authorization, and 39.8% were unsure. Conclusion: TeleNP adoption in LA increased during the pandemic and is perceived as a valid, accessible modality to address geographic disparities in neuropsychological care. However, heterogeneous implementation, regulatory uncertainty, and technological limitations remain major challenges, underscoring the need for standardized guidelines.
AB - The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) to deliver remote neuropsychological services in settings with limited clinic access. Objective: To examine TeleNP practices in Latin America (LA), focusing on clinicians’ perceptions of utility, validity, and barriers. Methods: A descriptive, exploratory cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2020 and January 2021 among health professionals practicing neuropsychology in LA. The instrument, validated through a Delphi process, assessed professional background, TeleNP use, patient profiles, applied tests, and perceived advantages and challenges. Results: A total of 212 clinicians from 10 countries participated (mean age and clinical experience=42.7 years and 12.3 years, respectively). Participants were primarily psychologists (75.9%), but also neurologists, geriatricians, psychiatrists and speech-language pathologists. TeleNP adoption rose from 4.2% regular and 13.7% occasional pre-pandemic use to 58% at the time of the survey, with significant cross-country variation (χ2=79.0, df=30, p<0.001). TeleNP was used mainly for patient (90%) and informant (89.5%) interviews, screening (71.8%), and, in half of the cases, more extensive assessments. The advantages reported were improved access (81.5%), reduced transportation costs (79.8%), patient comfort (66.1%), and easier scheduling (66.1%). The main barrier identified was limited patient connectivity (84.7%). Regulatory knowledge was heterogeneous: 36.7% reported TeleNP authorization in their country, 23.5% reported no authorization, and 39.8% were unsure. Conclusion: TeleNP adoption in LA increased during the pandemic and is perceived as a valid, accessible modality to address geographic disparities in neuropsychological care. However, heterogeneous implementation, regulatory uncertainty, and technological limitations remain major challenges, underscoring the need for standardized guidelines.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Dementia
KW - Health Services Accessibility
KW - Latin America
KW - Neuropsychological Tests
KW - Neuropsychology
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030685958
U2 - 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2025-0429
DO - 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2025-0429
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105030685958
SN - 1980-5764
VL - 20
JO - Dementia e Neuropsychologia
JF - Dementia e Neuropsychologia
M1 - e20250429
ER -