Resumen
This article rereads Benedict de Spinoza and recent interpretations of him as an epistemic democrat through the prism of contemporary debate on the conditions for deliberation in a democracy. Through a reconstruction of Spinoza's arguments and theories of deliberation and its preconditions, we argue that, for deliberation to produce the benefits Spinoza recognizes, the process must be inclusive, and those deliberating must be both intellectually humble and autonomous. This interpretation is new and diverges from those recently advanced by Justin Steinberg and Sandra Leonie Field. In particular, on our reading, Spinoza's critique of humility does not extend to intellectual humility as it is understood today in political theory. Both autonomy and humility, as epistemologically conceived by political theorists today, can therefore be considered Spinozian civic virtues.
Idioma original | Inglés |
---|---|
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 117-142 |
Número de páginas | 26 |
Publicación | History of Philosophy Quarterly |
Volumen | 41 |
N.º | 2 |
DOI | |
Estado | Publicada - abr. 2024 |
Publicado de forma externa | Sí |