TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial variability in community composition on a granite breakwater versus natural rocky shores
T2 - Lack of microhabitats suppresses intertidal biodiversity
AU - Aguilera, Moisés A.
AU - Broitman, Bernardo R.
AU - Thiel, Martin
N1 - Funding Information:
We greatly appreciate the help of Carlos Julian González and Constanza A. Aguilera Vergara during sampling and all member of ChangoLab working group for camaraderie and friendship. We also thank Erasmo Macaya for helping in species identifications of seaweeds. Field work was financed by a grant from the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico of Chile (FONDECYT) to MAA (grant # 11121360) and (grant # 1120988) to BRB and MAA. We also thank one anonymous referee and the managing editor Charles Sheppard for improvement of a final version of the MS.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2014/10/15
Y1 - 2014/10/15
N2 - Strong differences have been observed between the assemblages on artificial reefs and on natural hard-bottom habitats worldwide, but little is known about the mechanisms that cause contrasting biodiversity patterns. We examined the influence of spatial attributes in relation to both biogenic and topographic microhabitats, in the distribution and composition of intertidal species on both artificial and natural reefs. We found higher small-scale spatial heterogeneity on the natural reef compared with the study breakwater. Species richness and diversity were associated with a higher availability of crevices, rock pools and mussels in natural habitats. Spatial distribution of certain grazers corresponded well with the spatial structure of microhabitats. In contrast, the lack of microhabitats on the breakwater resulted in the absence of several grazers reflected in lower species richness. Biogenic and topographic microhabitats can have interactive effects providing niche opportunities for multiple species, explaining differences in species diversity between artificial versus natural reefs.
AB - Strong differences have been observed between the assemblages on artificial reefs and on natural hard-bottom habitats worldwide, but little is known about the mechanisms that cause contrasting biodiversity patterns. We examined the influence of spatial attributes in relation to both biogenic and topographic microhabitats, in the distribution and composition of intertidal species on both artificial and natural reefs. We found higher small-scale spatial heterogeneity on the natural reef compared with the study breakwater. Species richness and diversity were associated with a higher availability of crevices, rock pools and mussels in natural habitats. Spatial distribution of certain grazers corresponded well with the spatial structure of microhabitats. In contrast, the lack of microhabitats on the breakwater resulted in the absence of several grazers reflected in lower species richness. Biogenic and topographic microhabitats can have interactive effects providing niche opportunities for multiple species, explaining differences in species diversity between artificial versus natural reefs.
KW - Artificial reefs
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Breakwater
KW - Grazers
KW - Microhabitats
KW - Spatial heterogeneity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925547073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.07.046
DO - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.07.046
M3 - Article
C2 - 25103901
AN - SCOPUS:84925547073
VL - 87
SP - 257
EP - 268
JO - Marine Pollution Bulletin
JF - Marine Pollution Bulletin
SN - 0025-326X
IS - 1
ER -