TY - JOUR
T1 - Social media in Latin America
T2 - Deepening or bridging gaps in protest participation?
AU - Valenzuela, Sebastián
AU - Somma, Nicolás M.
AU - Scherman, Andrés
AU - Arriagada, Arturo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between social media use and protest participation in Latin America. It advances two questions. First, does social media increase the chances of protest participation at the individual level, as prior research shows for advanced democracies? Second, in a region with glaring economic and political inequalities, does social media deepen or reduce the gaps in protest participation that exist among men and women, the young and the old, different social classes, or people with varying levels of political engagement? Design/methodology/approach-The paper uses cross-sectional Latin American Public Opinion Project survey data from 2012 representing the adult population of 17 Latin American countries. It presents binary logistic regression models with protest participation as the dependent variable, social media use for political purposes as the main independent variable, control variables, and interactions. Findings-Using social media for political purposes significantly increases protest chances-it is the second strongest predictor. Additionally, social media reduces protest gaps associated with individuals' age, gender, psychological engagement with politics, and recruitment networks. Originality/value-First, the paper shows that the contribution of social media to collective protest travels beyond advanced democracies-it also holds for more unequal regions with weaker democratic trajectories like Latin America. Second, it shows that social media may mitigate participatory inequalities not only, as shown by past research, regarding institutional participation (e.g. voting), but also regarding contentious tactics.
AB - Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between social media use and protest participation in Latin America. It advances two questions. First, does social media increase the chances of protest participation at the individual level, as prior research shows for advanced democracies? Second, in a region with glaring economic and political inequalities, does social media deepen or reduce the gaps in protest participation that exist among men and women, the young and the old, different social classes, or people with varying levels of political engagement? Design/methodology/approach-The paper uses cross-sectional Latin American Public Opinion Project survey data from 2012 representing the adult population of 17 Latin American countries. It presents binary logistic regression models with protest participation as the dependent variable, social media use for political purposes as the main independent variable, control variables, and interactions. Findings-Using social media for political purposes significantly increases protest chances-it is the second strongest predictor. Additionally, social media reduces protest gaps associated with individuals' age, gender, psychological engagement with politics, and recruitment networks. Originality/value-First, the paper shows that the contribution of social media to collective protest travels beyond advanced democracies-it also holds for more unequal regions with weaker democratic trajectories like Latin America. Second, it shows that social media may mitigate participatory inequalities not only, as shown by past research, regarding institutional participation (e.g. voting), but also regarding contentious tactics.
KW - Cross-national surveys
KW - Latin America
KW - Political behaviour
KW - Political inequality
KW - Protest participation
KW - Social media
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986320264&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0347
DO - 10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0347
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84986320264
SN - 1468-4527
VL - 40
SP - 695
EP - 711
JO - Online Information Review
JF - Online Information Review
IS - 5
ER -