Resumen
The philosophies of Wolff and Baumgarten have been traditionally evaluated as mere systematizations of the doctrines of Leibniz, and, therefore, as lacking all originality. The paper revises that opinion, focusing on the specific problem of the interaction of natural substances, in order to show that they do not follow Leibniz as closely with respect to some of the central principles of pre-established harmony. It also questions the use of "Leibnizianism" as a label to refer to a homogeneous and undifferentiated body of doctrines.
| Título traducido de la contribución | How leibnizian were the "leibnizians" Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the theory of preestablished harmony |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 107-135 |
| Número de páginas | 29 |
| Publicación | Ideas y Valores |
| Volumen | 63 |
| N.º | 154 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - abr 2014 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
Palabras clave
- A. G. Baumgarten
- Ch. Wolff
- G. W. Leibniz
- Preestablished harmony
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Qué tan leibnizianos eran los "leibnizianos" Ch. Wolff y A. G. Baumgarten? Reflexiones acerca de la teoría de la armonía preestablecida'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver