Resumen
In Anarchy, State and Utopia, Robert Nozick holds that moral side-constraints reflects the underlying Kantian's principle that individuals are ends and not merely means. He also points out that these moral side-constraints lead to the libertarian natural rights. In this paper I will analyze the alleged Kantian foundation of Nozick's political philosophy and the conceptual relationship between kantian's conception of dignity and self-ownership principle, which is widely accepted as the last foundation of Nozick's theory of justice. I will conclude that, despite certain similarities, self-ownership and kantian's conception of dignity are conceptually incompatible. Likewise, I will conclude that the concept of self-ownership is a key element in the understanding of Nozick's libertarianism and, therefore, as an exegetic tool of it, it should be preferred over the kantian's concept of dignity.
| Título traducido de la contribución | Self-ownership, libertarian rights and Kantian autonomy: Does Robert Nozick's Anarchy, state and Utopia have a Kantian foundation? |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 909-930 |
| Número de páginas | 22 |
| Publicación | Pensamiento |
| Volumen | 71 |
| N.º | 268 |
| Estado | Publicada - 1 sept 2015 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
Palabras clave
- Kant
- Libertarianism
- Natural law
- Nozick
- Self-ownership
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Propiedad sobre sí mismo, derechos liberales y autonomía: El fundamento kantiano de anarquía, estado y utopía de robert nozick?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver