TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence, clinical management, and natural course of incidental findings on brain MR images
T2 - The population-based Rotterdam scan study
AU - Bos, Daniel
AU - Poels, Marielle M.F.
AU - Adams, Hieab H.H.
AU - Akoudad, Saloua
AU - Cremers, Lotte G.M.
AU - Zonneveld, Hazel I.
AU - Hoogendam, Yoo Y.
AU - Verhaaren, Benjamin F.J.
AU - Verlinden, Vincent J.A.
AU - Verbruggen, Jasper G.J.
AU - Peymani, Abbas
AU - Hofman, Albert
AU - Krestin, Gabriel P.
AU - Vincent, Arnaud J.
AU - Feelders, Richard A.
AU - Koudstaal, Peter J.
AU - Van Der Lugt, Aad
AU - Ikram, M. Arfan
AU - Vernooij, Meike W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2016.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Purpose: To present an updated prevalence estimate for incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance (MR) images and provide information on clinical relevance, including natural course, over a period of up to 9 years. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board and all participants gave informed consent. In a prospective population-based setting, structural brain MR imaging was performed in 5800 participants (mean age, 64.9 years; 3194 women [55.1%]). Trained reviewers recorded abnormalities, which were subsequently evaluated by neuroradiologists. The prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) of incidental findings was determined, and clinical management of findings that required the attention of a medical specialist was followed. Follow-up imaging in the study context provided information on the natural course of findings that were not referred. Results: In 549 of 5800 participants (9.5% [95% CI: 8.7%, 10.3%]), incidental findings were found, of which meningiomas (143 of 5800; 2.5% [95% CI: 2.1%, 2.9%]) and cerebral aneurysms (134 of 5800; 2.3% [95% CI: 2.0%, 2.7%]) were most common. A total of 188 participants were referred to medical specialists for incidental findings (3.2% [95% CI: 2.8%, 3.7%]). Of these, 144 (76.6% [95% CI: 70.1%, 82.1%]) either underwent a wait-andsee policy or were discharged after the initial clinical visit. The majority of meningiomas and virtually all aneurysms not referred or referred but untreated remained stable in size during follow-up. Conclusion: Incidental findings at brain MR imaging that necessitate further diagnostic evaluation occur in over 3% of the general middle-aged and elderly population, but are mostly without direct clinical consequences.
AB - Purpose: To present an updated prevalence estimate for incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance (MR) images and provide information on clinical relevance, including natural course, over a period of up to 9 years. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board and all participants gave informed consent. In a prospective population-based setting, structural brain MR imaging was performed in 5800 participants (mean age, 64.9 years; 3194 women [55.1%]). Trained reviewers recorded abnormalities, which were subsequently evaluated by neuroradiologists. The prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) of incidental findings was determined, and clinical management of findings that required the attention of a medical specialist was followed. Follow-up imaging in the study context provided information on the natural course of findings that were not referred. Results: In 549 of 5800 participants (9.5% [95% CI: 8.7%, 10.3%]), incidental findings were found, of which meningiomas (143 of 5800; 2.5% [95% CI: 2.1%, 2.9%]) and cerebral aneurysms (134 of 5800; 2.3% [95% CI: 2.0%, 2.7%]) were most common. A total of 188 participants were referred to medical specialists for incidental findings (3.2% [95% CI: 2.8%, 3.7%]). Of these, 144 (76.6% [95% CI: 70.1%, 82.1%]) either underwent a wait-andsee policy or were discharged after the initial clinical visit. The majority of meningiomas and virtually all aneurysms not referred or referred but untreated remained stable in size during follow-up. Conclusion: Incidental findings at brain MR imaging that necessitate further diagnostic evaluation occur in over 3% of the general middle-aged and elderly population, but are mostly without direct clinical consequences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992016863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2016160218
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2016160218
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27337027
AN - SCOPUS:84992016863
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 281
SP - 507
EP - 515
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 2
ER -