Resumen
This paper examines the interpretive power of the Off ice of the Comptroller-General as a forum for dispute resolution between public administration and private parties. It examines four features of this power that enable us to assess it as an alternative to judicial review. First, the distinctive combination of impartiality and expertise is discussed. Secondly, the lesser hurdles to legal remedies against unlawful administrative action are analysed. Thirdly, the use of more flexible and informal decisionmaking procedures in comparison to the judicial ones is considered. Finally, the weak final character of the Comptroller's rulings is examined, considering that they are not binding for the courts.
| Título traducido de la contribución | Why do private parties litigate at the Comptroller's Office? The interpretive power as a dispute resolution forum |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 165-192 |
| Número de páginas | 28 |
| Publicación | Revista de Derecho Administrativo Economico |
| N.º | 37 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - ene 2023 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
ODS 16: Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
Palabras clave
- Administrative justice
- General
- Interpretive rulings
- Office of the Comptroller
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de '¿Por qué los particulares litigan en la Contraloría? La potestad dictaminante como foro de resolución de disputas'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver