¿Es el mejoramiento cognitivo dañino? Perspectiva de la afectación personal y del valor independiente

Daniel Loewe

doi:10.4013/fsu.2017.183.01

¿Es el mejoramiento cognitivo dañino? Perspectiva de la afectación personal y del valor independiente

Daniel Loewe

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo de revisión › revisión exhaustiva

Resumen

The paper discusses criticisms against pharmacological cognitive enhancement from a liberal perspective. The criticisms point to the consequences of cognitive enhancement in third parties and in the agents, as well as in independent values. According to the article, these criticisms are not convincing. On the contrary, it argues that under certain assumptions there are good reasons in favor of free access to cognitive enhancement.

Título traducido de la contribución	Is cognitive enhancement harmful? Personal affectation and independent value points of view
Idioma original	Español
Páginas (desde-hasta)	117-129
Número de páginas	13
Publicación	Filosofia Unisinos
Volumen	18
N.º	3
DOI	https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2017.183.01
Estado	Publicada - 1 sept 2017
Publicado de forma externa	Sí

Palabras clave

Harm on others
Harm on the agents
Independent values
Liberalism
Pharmacological cognitive enhancement

Acceder al documento

10.4013/fsu.2017.183.01

Citar esto

@article{dd4cbf078ca94c36babd07c92709bf47,

title = "¿Es el mejoramiento cognitivo da{\~n}ino? Perspectiva de la afectaci{\'o}n personal y del valor independiente",

abstract = "The paper discusses criticisms against pharmacological cognitive enhancement from a liberal perspective. The criticisms point to the consequences of cognitive enhancement in third parties and in the agents, as well as in independent values. According to the article, these criticisms are not convincing. On the contrary, it argues that under certain assumptions there are good reasons in favor of free access to cognitive enhancement.",

keywords = "Harm on others, Harm on the agents, Independent values, Liberalism, Pharmacological cognitive enhancement",

author = "Daniel Loewe",

year = "2017",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.4013/fsu.2017.183.01",

language = "Spanish",

volume = "18",

pages = "117--129",

journal = "Filosofia Unisinos",

issn = "1519-5023",

publisher = "Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ¿Es el mejoramiento cognitivo dañino? Perspectiva de la afectación personal y del valor independiente

AU - Loewe, Daniel

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - The paper discusses criticisms against pharmacological cognitive enhancement from a liberal perspective. The criticisms point to the consequences of cognitive enhancement in third parties and in the agents, as well as in independent values. According to the article, these criticisms are not convincing. On the contrary, it argues that under certain assumptions there are good reasons in favor of free access to cognitive enhancement.

AB - The paper discusses criticisms against pharmacological cognitive enhancement from a liberal perspective. The criticisms point to the consequences of cognitive enhancement in third parties and in the agents, as well as in independent values. According to the article, these criticisms are not convincing. On the contrary, it argues that under certain assumptions there are good reasons in favor of free access to cognitive enhancement.

KW - Harm on others

KW - Harm on the agents

KW - Independent values

KW - Liberalism

KW - Pharmacological cognitive enhancement

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85046274055

U2 - 10.4013/fsu.2017.183.01

DO - 10.4013/fsu.2017.183.01

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85046274055

SN - 1519-5023

VL - 18

SP - 117

EP - 129

JO - Filosofia Unisinos

JF - Filosofia Unisinos

IS - 3

ER -

¿Es el mejoramiento cognitivo dañino? Perspectiva de la afectación personal y del valor independiente

Resumen

Palabras clave

Acceder al documento

Huella

Citar esto