TY - JOUR
T1 - Choosing policy instruments for controlling ozone depleting substances in a developing context
T2 - The case of Chile
AU - O'Ryan, Raúl
AU - Ulloa, Andrés
AU - Asencio, Gonzalo
N1 - Funding Information:
The Authors wish to thank financial support from project Fondecyt 1990617.
PY - 2006/9/1
Y1 - 2006/9/1
N2 - Chile ratified the Montreal Protocol in 1990 which sets out an agenda for the reduction and then elimination of ozone depleting substances (ODS); however, by 1998 the country had not yet defined a strategy to encourage greater compliance, so that in the same year the National Environmental Commission decided to examine the policy options available. This paper examines the process followed to develop this strategy. As a first step it was necessary to look at how far the implicit policy of "business as usual" could be stretched without jeopardizing Chile's compliance obligations. A second step included quantifying compliance costs and their impact on different policy instruments and so policy choice. Finally, the attitudes of decision-makers or participants were identified, by interviews with officials of the different public agents involved, in order to weigh their views about policy. A strategy was proposed, based on this information, which the Chilean regulator has used, although not in its entirety. The methodology developed could well be useful for developing-country Protocol signatories building their own appropriate compliance strategy.
AB - Chile ratified the Montreal Protocol in 1990 which sets out an agenda for the reduction and then elimination of ozone depleting substances (ODS); however, by 1998 the country had not yet defined a strategy to encourage greater compliance, so that in the same year the National Environmental Commission decided to examine the policy options available. This paper examines the process followed to develop this strategy. As a first step it was necessary to look at how far the implicit policy of "business as usual" could be stretched without jeopardizing Chile's compliance obligations. A second step included quantifying compliance costs and their impact on different policy instruments and so policy choice. Finally, the attitudes of decision-makers or participants were identified, by interviews with officials of the different public agents involved, in order to weigh their views about policy. A strategy was proposed, based on this information, which the Chilean regulator has used, although not in its entirety. The methodology developed could well be useful for developing-country Protocol signatories building their own appropriate compliance strategy.
KW - Cost-effectiveness
KW - Environmental economics
KW - Montreal protocol
KW - Policy instrument choice
KW - Program assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746367438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.021
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 16600473
AN - SCOPUS:33746367438
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 80
SP - 347
EP - 362
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
IS - 4
ER -