TY - JOUR
T1 - Bias adjustment to preserve changes in variability
T2 - the unbiased mapping of GCM changes
AU - Chadwick, Cristián
AU - Gironás, Jorge
AU - González-Leiva, Fernando
AU - Aedo, Sebastián
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Standard quantile mapping (QM) performs well, as a bias adjustment method, in removing historical climate biases, but it can significantly alter a global climate model (GCM) signal. Methods that do incorporate GCM changes commonly consider mean changes only. Quantile delta mapping (QDM) is an exception, as it explicitly preserves relative changes in the quantiles, but it might present biases in preserving GCMs changes in standard deviation. In this work we propose the unbiased quantile mapping (UQM) method, which by construction preserves GCM changes of the mean and the standard deviation. Synthetic experiments and four Chilean locations are used to compare the performance of UQM against QDM, QM, detrended quantile mapping, and scale distribution mapping. All the methods outperform QM, but a tradeoff exists between preserving the GCM relative changes in the quantiles (QDM is recommended in this case), or changes in the GCM moments (UQM is recommended in this case).
AB - Standard quantile mapping (QM) performs well, as a bias adjustment method, in removing historical climate biases, but it can significantly alter a global climate model (GCM) signal. Methods that do incorporate GCM changes commonly consider mean changes only. Quantile delta mapping (QDM) is an exception, as it explicitly preserves relative changes in the quantiles, but it might present biases in preserving GCMs changes in standard deviation. In this work we propose the unbiased quantile mapping (UQM) method, which by construction preserves GCM changes of the mean and the standard deviation. Synthetic experiments and four Chilean locations are used to compare the performance of UQM against QDM, QM, detrended quantile mapping, and scale distribution mapping. All the methods outperform QM, but a tradeoff exists between preserving the GCM relative changes in the quantiles (QDM is recommended in this case), or changes in the GCM moments (UQM is recommended in this case).
KW - GCM
KW - bias adjustment
KW - climate change
KW - quantile mapping
KW - uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160046307&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02626667.2023.2201450
DO - 10.1080/02626667.2023.2201450
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85160046307
SN - 0262-6667
VL - 68
SP - 1184
EP - 1201
JO - Hydrological Sciences Journal
JF - Hydrological Sciences Journal
IS - 8
ER -