TY - GEN
T1 - Using Chat-GPT for coding properties in semantic memory studies
AU - Ramos, Diego
AU - Moreno, Sebastián
AU - Canessa, Enrique
AU - Chaigneau, Sergio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - In this paper, we propose Chat-GPT for the codification of a Property Listing Task (PLT). PLTs are a standard method to study semantic memory (understanding how people represent concepts coded in their minds). In a PLT, a group of participants is asked to list properties/features for a concept (e.g., “horse”). Given that different properties could have the same meaning (e.g., “quadruped” and “four legs”), the mentioned properties must be codified before any analysis. Currently, the codification process is carried out by at least two human coders, making it a slow and non-replicable process (given the variability of codes assigned by the coders). Automating this codification process through Chat-GPT will speed up the codification, reduce the variability of the human codification process, and allow replicable results. We compare Chat-GPT with AC-PLT (the first semi-automatic codification framework for PLTs), using accuracy on two datasets. The experiment compares AC-PLT with GPT-3.5-turbo-0125 (using one-shot prompting and fine-tuning) and GPT-4o (using one-shot prompting). GPT-3.5-turbo-0125 with fine-tuning shows comparable performance with AC-PLT, opening a possible area of research for this codification process.
AB - In this paper, we propose Chat-GPT for the codification of a Property Listing Task (PLT). PLTs are a standard method to study semantic memory (understanding how people represent concepts coded in their minds). In a PLT, a group of participants is asked to list properties/features for a concept (e.g., “horse”). Given that different properties could have the same meaning (e.g., “quadruped” and “four legs”), the mentioned properties must be codified before any analysis. Currently, the codification process is carried out by at least two human coders, making it a slow and non-replicable process (given the variability of codes assigned by the coders). Automating this codification process through Chat-GPT will speed up the codification, reduce the variability of the human codification process, and allow replicable results. We compare Chat-GPT with AC-PLT (the first semi-automatic codification framework for PLTs), using accuracy on two datasets. The experiment compares AC-PLT with GPT-3.5-turbo-0125 (using one-shot prompting and fine-tuning) and GPT-4o (using one-shot prompting). GPT-3.5-turbo-0125 with fine-tuning shows comparable performance with AC-PLT, opening a possible area of research for this codification process.
KW - Codification
KW - Large Language models
KW - Property Listing Task
KW - Semantic Memory
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105032179245
U2 - 10.1109/ICPRS66293.2025.11302840
DO - 10.1109/ICPRS66293.2025.11302840
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105032179245
T3 - 2025 15th IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition Systems, ICPRS 2025
BT - 2025 15th IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition Systems, ICPRS 2025
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 15th IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition Systems, ICPRS 2025
Y2 - 1 December 2025 through 4 December 2025
ER -