TY - JOUR
T1 - Unveiling Trail Making Test
T2 - visual and manual trajectories indexing multiple executive processes
AU - Linari, Ignacio
AU - Juantorena, Gustavo E.
AU - Ibáñez, Agustín
AU - Petroni, Agustín
AU - Kamienkowski, Juan E.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Sol Fitipaldi and Lucas Sedeño for training IL on the administration and interpretation of the INECO Frontal Screening to the participants. The authors thank Valeria Mussel for her help proofreading the manuscript. The authors were supported by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and the Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA). The research was supported by the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2018-2699) and the CONICET (PIP 11220150100787CO). AI is supported by grants from CONICET; ANID/FONDECYT Regular (1170010); FONCYT-PICT 2017-1820; ANID/FONDAP/15150012; Takeda CW2680521; Sistema General de Regalías (BPIN2018000100059), Universidad del Valle (CI 5316); Alzheimer’s Association GBHI ALZ UK-20-639295; and the MULTI-PARTNER CONSORTIUM TO EXPAND DEMENTIA RESEARCH IN LATIN AMERICA [ReDLat, supported by National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Aging (R01 AG057234), Alzheimer’s Association (SG-20-725707), Rainwater Charitable foundation—Tau Consortium, and Global Brain Health Institute)]. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of these Institutions.
Funding Information:
We thank Sol Fitipaldi and Lucas Sedeño for training IL on the administration and interpretation of the INECO Frontal Screening to the participants. The authors thank Valeria Mussel for her help proofreading the manuscript. The authors were supported by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and the Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA). The research was supported by the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2018-2699) and the CONICET (PIP 11220150100787CO). AI is supported by grants from CONICET; ANID/FONDECYT Regular (1170010); FONCYT-PICT 2017-1820; ANID/FONDAP/15150012; Takeda CW2680521; Sistema General de Regalías (BPIN2018000100059), Universidad del Valle (CI 5316); Alzheimer’s Association GBHI ALZ UK-20-639295; and the MULTI-PARTNER CONSORTIUM TO EXPAND DEMENTIA RESEARCH IN LATIN AMERICA [ReDLat, supported by National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Aging (R01 AG057234), Alzheimer’s Association (SG-20-725707), Rainwater Charitable foundation—Tau Consortium, and Global Brain Health Institute)]. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of these Institutions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - The Trail Making Test (TMT) is one of the most popular neuropsychological tests for executive functions (EFs) assessment. It presents several strengths: it is sensitive to executive dysfunction, it is easy to understand, and has a short administration. However, it has important limitations. First, the underlying EFs articulated during the task are not well discriminated, which makes it a test with low specificity. Second, the pen-and-paper version presents one trial per condition which introduces high variability. Third, only the total time is quantified, which does not allow for a detailed analysis. Fourth, it has a fixed spatial configuration per condition. We designed a computerised version of the TMT to overcome its main limitations and evaluated it in a group of neurotypical adults. Eye and hand positions are measured with high resolution over several trials, and spatial configuration is controlled. Our results showed a very similar performance profile compared to the traditional TMT. Moreover, it revealed differences in eye movements between parts A and B. Most importantly, based on hand and eye movements, we found an internal working memory measure that showed an association to a validated working memory task. Additionally, we proposed another internal measure as a potential marker of inhibitory control. Our results showed that EFs can be studied in more detail using traditional tests combined with powerful digital setups. The cTMT showed potential use in older adult populations and patients with EFs disorders.
AB - The Trail Making Test (TMT) is one of the most popular neuropsychological tests for executive functions (EFs) assessment. It presents several strengths: it is sensitive to executive dysfunction, it is easy to understand, and has a short administration. However, it has important limitations. First, the underlying EFs articulated during the task are not well discriminated, which makes it a test with low specificity. Second, the pen-and-paper version presents one trial per condition which introduces high variability. Third, only the total time is quantified, which does not allow for a detailed analysis. Fourth, it has a fixed spatial configuration per condition. We designed a computerised version of the TMT to overcome its main limitations and evaluated it in a group of neurotypical adults. Eye and hand positions are measured with high resolution over several trials, and spatial configuration is controlled. Our results showed a very similar performance profile compared to the traditional TMT. Moreover, it revealed differences in eye movements between parts A and B. Most importantly, based on hand and eye movements, we found an internal working memory measure that showed an association to a validated working memory task. Additionally, we proposed another internal measure as a potential marker of inhibitory control. Our results showed that EFs can be studied in more detail using traditional tests combined with powerful digital setups. The cTMT showed potential use in older adult populations and patients with EFs disorders.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136189147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-022-16431-9
DO - 10.1038/s41598-022-16431-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 35995786
AN - SCOPUS:85136189147
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 12
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 14265
ER -