Uma década de audiências públicas no Supremo Tribunal Federal (2007-2017)

Translated title of the contribution: A decade of public hearings in the supreme Federal Tribunal (2007-2017)

Fernando Leal, Rachel Herdy, Júlia Massadas

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present article offers an assessment of the last 10 years of public hearings in the Brazilian Supreme Federal Tribunal. It is argued that, during this period, the institute has been employed in an incoherent and inconsistent manner. The incoherency refers especially to the attempt to attribute the function of democratic legitimacy to the institute of public hearings. This association between public hearings and democracy can be criticized on the basis of normative reasons, with respect to the positive law, and conceptual reasons. On the other hand, the inconsistency refers to the unstandardized operationalization of the institute. This second conclusion will be argued with the help of a set of mostly quantitative analysis.

Translated title of the contributionA decade of public hearings in the supreme Federal Tribunal (2007-2017)
Original languagePortuguese
Pages (from-to)331-372
Number of pages42
JournalRevista de Investigacoes Constitucionais
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Democratic legitimacy
  • Epistemic justification
  • Judicial review
  • Public hearings
  • Scientific knowledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A decade of public hearings in the supreme Federal Tribunal (2007-2017)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this