The So-Called Refusal to Assess Evidence in the Scholarship and Case Law

Translated title of the contribution: The So-Called Refusal to Assess Evidence in the Scholarship and Case Law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper analyzes the so-called refusal to assess evidence in the Chilean criminal process. For this purpose, the most relevant case law of the higher courts in favor and against this possibility is presented, while also explaining the doctrine’s stance in this regard. In conclusion, the reader is provided with a position in favor of such refusal to assess evidence, understanding it as a mechanism to safeguard the effective protection of fundamental guarantees in obtaining evidence, beyond the exclusionary rule of evidence.

Translated title of the contributionThe So-Called Refusal to Assess Evidence in the Scholarship and Case Law
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-121
Number of pages28
JournalLatin American Legal Studies
Volume8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • criminal process
  • evidence valoration
  • illicit evidence
  • probatory law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The So-Called Refusal to Assess Evidence in the Scholarship and Case Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this