TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of trade integration on formal and informal entrepreneurship
T2 - The moderating role of economic development
AU - Moore, Elizabeth M.
AU - Dau, Luis Alfonso
AU - Mingo, Santiago
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the editors Arjen van Witteloostuijn and Alain Verbeke, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their supportive feedback on this article. We are also very grateful for the support of Bettina Alvarez Canelon, Alyssa Cecchetelli, Ania Palka Dau, Larissa Marchiori Pacheco, Karen Moore, Gary Moore, and various conference participants. This article is based on the dissertation and doctoral work and data collection efforts of the first author, and thus builds on and is related to other projects, some of which we cite appropriately (for example Moore, Brandl, & Dau, 2019; Moore, Dau, & Doh, 2020), and others which are under review and we therefore do not cite to maintain the integrity of the double-blind review process. The following sources supplied indispensable financial assistance for this research project: Northeastern University’s Global Resilience Institute and Robert and Denise DiCenso Professorship, University of Reading Henley Business School’s Dunning Visiting Fellowship, University of Leeds Business School’s Buckley Visiting Fellowship, and ANID / CONICYT FONDECYT Regular 1181764. All errors remain our own.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Academy of International Business.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Does entrepreneurship in a country benefit from trade integration? Moreover, do all types of entrepreneurs respond the same way to this integration? Specifically focusing on formal and informal entrepreneurship, we analyze the effects of trade integration in the context of different levels of economic development. First, we propose that trade integration increases a country’s formal entrepreneurship while decreasing a country’s informal entrepreneurship. A key mechanism explains this relationship: trade agreements provide supranational institutional structures that encourage formal, and discourage informal, venture creation. We dig deeper into this issue by arguing that these effects are stronger in less developed countries than highly developed countries. Analyses using a panel of 68 countries spanning 11 years provide robust support for these assertions. While our findings are aligned with previous scholarship that describes the asymmetric benefits of trade agreements for member nations, we add refinement by teasing out where the impacts are strongest (e.g., for entrepreneurial formalization in less developed countries) and where the impacts are less pronounced (e.g., for entrepreneurial formalization in highest developed countries). Thus, as policy makers continue to face challenging questions related to trade relationships, these results prompt future scholarship to examine other such potential benefits and asymmetries.
AB - Does entrepreneurship in a country benefit from trade integration? Moreover, do all types of entrepreneurs respond the same way to this integration? Specifically focusing on formal and informal entrepreneurship, we analyze the effects of trade integration in the context of different levels of economic development. First, we propose that trade integration increases a country’s formal entrepreneurship while decreasing a country’s informal entrepreneurship. A key mechanism explains this relationship: trade agreements provide supranational institutional structures that encourage formal, and discourage informal, venture creation. We dig deeper into this issue by arguing that these effects are stronger in less developed countries than highly developed countries. Analyses using a panel of 68 countries spanning 11 years provide robust support for these assertions. While our findings are aligned with previous scholarship that describes the asymmetric benefits of trade agreements for member nations, we add refinement by teasing out where the impacts are strongest (e.g., for entrepreneurial formalization in less developed countries) and where the impacts are less pronounced (e.g., for entrepreneurial formalization in highest developed countries). Thus, as policy makers continue to face challenging questions related to trade relationships, these results prompt future scholarship to examine other such potential benefits and asymmetries.
KW - economic development
KW - entrepreneurship
KW - new institutional economics
KW - regression analysis
KW - trade agreements
KW - trade integration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099975131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1057/s41267-020-00386-y
DO - 10.1057/s41267-020-00386-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099975131
SN - 0047-2506
VL - 52
SP - 746
EP - 772
JO - Journal of International Business Studies
JF - Journal of International Business Studies
IS - 4
ER -