TY - JOUR
T1 - Simple phenothiazine-based sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells
T2 - Impact of different electron-donors on their photovoltaic performances
AU - Elangovan, Kavery
AU - Saravanan, Prabhu
AU - Muruganantham, Subramanian
AU - Campos, Cristian H.
AU - Chidambaram, Siva
AU - Mangalaraja, Ramalinga Viswanathan
AU - Rajalingam, Renganathan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have been considered as a potential candidate to resolve the current energy crisis. Therefore, we synthesized a series of phenothiazine (PHE)-based sensitizers for the photovoltaic applications for the first time. The sensitizers include different auxiliary donors, namely hydrogen (without substituent) (PHE 1), phenyl (PHE 2), 4-octyloxy-phenyl (PHE 3), 4-dimethylamino-phenyl (PHE 4), and phenanthren-9-yl (PHE 5). The PHE 1–5 sensitizers were characterized well using NMR, HRMS, FTIR, absorption and emission spectral techniques, and DFT theoretical studies. According to the research findings, impressively, PHE 4 demonstrated significantly a higher photovoltaic efficiency of 1.00% compared to all other sensitizers and a 20-fold enhanced efficiency when compared to the PHE 1 based cell of 0.05%. The enhanced performance of the PHE 4 may be attributed to the higher ground and excited state binding ability to TiO2. The order of photovoltaic efficiency of the prepared sensitizers was PHE 4 > PHE 5 > PHE 3 > PHE 1 > PHE 2. This study revealed that the electron-donor substituent in the simple PHE-based sensitizers demonstrated a dynamic function in fine-tuning the performances of the DSSCs devices.
AB - Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have been considered as a potential candidate to resolve the current energy crisis. Therefore, we synthesized a series of phenothiazine (PHE)-based sensitizers for the photovoltaic applications for the first time. The sensitizers include different auxiliary donors, namely hydrogen (without substituent) (PHE 1), phenyl (PHE 2), 4-octyloxy-phenyl (PHE 3), 4-dimethylamino-phenyl (PHE 4), and phenanthren-9-yl (PHE 5). The PHE 1–5 sensitizers were characterized well using NMR, HRMS, FTIR, absorption and emission spectral techniques, and DFT theoretical studies. According to the research findings, impressively, PHE 4 demonstrated significantly a higher photovoltaic efficiency of 1.00% compared to all other sensitizers and a 20-fold enhanced efficiency when compared to the PHE 1 based cell of 0.05%. The enhanced performance of the PHE 4 may be attributed to the higher ground and excited state binding ability to TiO2. The order of photovoltaic efficiency of the prepared sensitizers was PHE 4 > PHE 5 > PHE 3 > PHE 1 > PHE 2. This study revealed that the electron-donor substituent in the simple PHE-based sensitizers demonstrated a dynamic function in fine-tuning the performances of the DSSCs devices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196008726&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10854-024-12870-4
DO - 10.1007/s10854-024-12870-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85196008726
SN - 0957-4522
VL - 35
JO - Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
JF - Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
IS - 17
M1 - 1150
ER -