TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-compassion and cultural values
T2 - A cross-cultural study of self-compassion using a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analytical procedure
AU - Montero-Marin, Jesus
AU - Kuyken, Willem
AU - Crane, Catherine
AU - Gu, Jenny
AU - Baer, Ruth
AU - Al-Awamleh, Aida A.
AU - Akutsu, Satoshi
AU - Araya-Véliz, Claudio
AU - Ghorbani, Nima
AU - Chen, Zhuo Job
AU - Kim, Min Sun
AU - Mantzios, Michail
AU - dos Santos, Danilo N.Rolim
AU - Serramo López, Luiz C.
AU - Teleb, Ahmed A.
AU - Watson, P. J.
AU - Yamaguchi, Ayano
AU - Yang, Eunjoo
AU - García-Campayo, Javier
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Montero-Marin, Kuyken, Crane, Gu, Baer, Al-Awamleh, Akutsu, Araya-Véliz, Ghorbani, Chen, Kim, Mantzios, Rolim dos Santos, Serramo López, Teleb, Watson, Yamaguchi, Yang and García-Campayo.
PY - 2018/12/21
Y1 - 2018/12/21
N2 - Self-compassion is natural, trainable and multi-faceted human capacity. To date there has been little research into the role of culture in influencing the conceptual structure of the underlying construct, the relative importance of different facets of self-compassion, nor its relationships to cultural values. This study employed a cross-cultural design, with 4,124 participants from 11 purposively sampled datasets drawn from different countries. We aimed to assess the relevance of positive and negative items when building the self-compassion construct, the convergence among the self-compassion components, and the possible influence of cultural values. Each dataset comprised undergraduate students who completed the "Self-Compassion Scale" (SCS). We used a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach to the multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) model, separating the variability into self-compassion components (self-kindness, common humanity, mindfulness), method (positive and negative valence), and error (uniqueness). The normative scores of the Values Survey Module (VSM) in each country, according to the cultural dimensions of individualism, masculinity, power distance, long-term orientation, uncertainty avoidance, and indulgence, were considered. We used Spearman coefficients (rs) to assess the degree of association between the cultural values and the variance coming from the positive and negative items to explain self-compassion traits, as well as the variance shared among the self-compassion traits, after removing the method effects produced by the item valence. The CFA applied to the MTMM model provided acceptable fit in all the samples. Positive items made a greater contribution to capturing the traits comprising self-compassion when the long-term orientation cultural value was higher (rs = 0.62; p = 0.042). Negative items did not make significant contributions to building the construct when the individualism cultural value was higher, but moderate effects were found (rs = 0.40; p = 0.228). The level of common variance among the self-compassion trait factors was inversely related to the indulgence cultural value (rs = -0.65; p = 0.030). The extent to which the positive and negative items contribute to explain self-compassion, and that different self-compassion facets might be regarded as reflecting a broader construct, might differ across cultural backgrounds.
AB - Self-compassion is natural, trainable and multi-faceted human capacity. To date there has been little research into the role of culture in influencing the conceptual structure of the underlying construct, the relative importance of different facets of self-compassion, nor its relationships to cultural values. This study employed a cross-cultural design, with 4,124 participants from 11 purposively sampled datasets drawn from different countries. We aimed to assess the relevance of positive and negative items when building the self-compassion construct, the convergence among the self-compassion components, and the possible influence of cultural values. Each dataset comprised undergraduate students who completed the "Self-Compassion Scale" (SCS). We used a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach to the multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) model, separating the variability into self-compassion components (self-kindness, common humanity, mindfulness), method (positive and negative valence), and error (uniqueness). The normative scores of the Values Survey Module (VSM) in each country, according to the cultural dimensions of individualism, masculinity, power distance, long-term orientation, uncertainty avoidance, and indulgence, were considered. We used Spearman coefficients (rs) to assess the degree of association between the cultural values and the variance coming from the positive and negative items to explain self-compassion traits, as well as the variance shared among the self-compassion traits, after removing the method effects produced by the item valence. The CFA applied to the MTMM model provided acceptable fit in all the samples. Positive items made a greater contribution to capturing the traits comprising self-compassion when the long-term orientation cultural value was higher (rs = 0.62; p = 0.042). Negative items did not make significant contributions to building the construct when the individualism cultural value was higher, but moderate effects were found (rs = 0.40; p = 0.228). The level of common variance among the self-compassion trait factors was inversely related to the indulgence cultural value (rs = -0.65; p = 0.030). The extent to which the positive and negative items contribute to explain self-compassion, and that different self-compassion facets might be regarded as reflecting a broader construct, might differ across cultural backgrounds.
KW - CFA
KW - Cross-cultural
KW - MTMM
KW - Multitrait-multimethod
KW - SCS
KW - Self-compassion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059021632&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02638
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02638
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85059021632
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 9
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
IS - DEC
M1 - 2638
ER -