TY - JOUR
T1 - Review article
T2 - Drought as a continuum – memory effects in interlinked hydrological, ecological, and social systems
AU - Van Loon, Anne F.
AU - Kchouk, Sarra
AU - Matanó, Alessia
AU - Tootoonchi, Faranak
AU - Alvarez-Garreton, Camila
AU - Hassaballah, Khalid E.A.
AU - Wu, Minchao
AU - Wens, Marthe L.K.
AU - Shyrokaya, Anastasiya
AU - Ridolfi, Elena
AU - Biella, Riccardo
AU - Nagavciuc, Viorica
AU - Barendrecht, Marlies H.
AU - Bastos, Ana
AU - Cavalcante, Louise
AU - de Vries, Franciska T.
AU - Garcia, Margaret
AU - Mård, Johanna
AU - Streefkerk, Ileen N.
AU - Teutschbein, Claudia
AU - Tootoonchi, Roshanak
AU - Weesie, Ruben
AU - Aich, Valentin
AU - Boisier, Juan P.
AU - Baldassarre, Giuliano Di
AU - Du, Yiheng
AU - Galleguillos, Mauricio
AU - Garreaud, René
AU - Ionita, Monica
AU - Khatami, Sina
AU - Koehler, Johanna K.L.
AU - Luce, Charles H.
AU - Maskey, Shreedhar
AU - Mendoza, Heidi D.
AU - Mwangi, Moses N.
AU - Pechlivanidis, Ilias G.
AU - Ribeiro Neto, Germano G.
AU - Roy, Tirthankar
AU - Stefanski, Robert
AU - Trambauer, Patricia
AU - Koebele, Elizabeth A.
AU - Vico, Giulia
AU - Werner, Micha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2024 Anne F. Van Loon et al.
PY - 2024/9/23
Y1 - 2024/9/23
N2 - Droughts are often long-lasting phenomena, without a distinct start or end and with impacts cascading across sectors and systems, creating long-term legacies. Nevertheless, our current perceptions and management of droughts and their impacts are often event-based, which can limit the effective assessment of drought risks and reduction of drought impacts. Here, we advocate for changing this perspective and viewing drought as a hydrological–ecological–social continuum. We take a systems theory perspective and focus on how “memory” causes feedback and interactions between parts of the interconnected systems at different timescales. We first discuss the characteristics of the drought continuum with a focus on the hydrological, ecological, and social systems separately, and then we study the system of systems. Our analysis is based on a review of the literature and a study of five cases: Chile, the Colorado River basin in the USA, northeast Brazil, Kenya, and the Rhine River basin in northwest Europe. We find that the memories of past dry and wet periods, carried by both bio-physical (e.g. groundwater, vegetation) and social systems (e.g. people, governance), influence how future drought risk manifests. We identify four archetypes of drought dynamics: impact and recovery, slow resilience building, gradual collapse, and high resilience–big shock. The interactions between the hydrological, ecological, and social systems result in systems shifting between these types, which plays out differently in the five case studies. We call for more research on drought preconditions and recovery in different systems, on dynamics cascading between systems and triggering system changes, and on dynamic vulnerability and maladaptation. Additionally, we advocate for more continuous monitoring of drought hazards and impacts, modelling tools that better incorporate memories and adaptation responses, and management strategies that increase societal and institutional memory. This will help us to better deal with the complex hydrological–ecological–social drought continuum and identify effective pathways to adaptation and mitigation.
AB - Droughts are often long-lasting phenomena, without a distinct start or end and with impacts cascading across sectors and systems, creating long-term legacies. Nevertheless, our current perceptions and management of droughts and their impacts are often event-based, which can limit the effective assessment of drought risks and reduction of drought impacts. Here, we advocate for changing this perspective and viewing drought as a hydrological–ecological–social continuum. We take a systems theory perspective and focus on how “memory” causes feedback and interactions between parts of the interconnected systems at different timescales. We first discuss the characteristics of the drought continuum with a focus on the hydrological, ecological, and social systems separately, and then we study the system of systems. Our analysis is based on a review of the literature and a study of five cases: Chile, the Colorado River basin in the USA, northeast Brazil, Kenya, and the Rhine River basin in northwest Europe. We find that the memories of past dry and wet periods, carried by both bio-physical (e.g. groundwater, vegetation) and social systems (e.g. people, governance), influence how future drought risk manifests. We identify four archetypes of drought dynamics: impact and recovery, slow resilience building, gradual collapse, and high resilience–big shock. The interactions between the hydrological, ecological, and social systems result in systems shifting between these types, which plays out differently in the five case studies. We call for more research on drought preconditions and recovery in different systems, on dynamics cascading between systems and triggering system changes, and on dynamic vulnerability and maladaptation. Additionally, we advocate for more continuous monitoring of drought hazards and impacts, modelling tools that better incorporate memories and adaptation responses, and management strategies that increase societal and institutional memory. This will help us to better deal with the complex hydrological–ecological–social drought continuum and identify effective pathways to adaptation and mitigation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205149950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/nhess-24-3173-2024
DO - 10.5194/nhess-24-3173-2024
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85205149950
SN - 1561-8633
VL - 24
SP - 3173
EP - 3205
JO - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
JF - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
IS - 9
ER -