Qué tan leibnizianos eran los "leibnizianos" Ch. Wolff y A. G. Baumgarten? Reflexiones acerca de la teoría de la armonía preestablecida

Translated title of the contribution: How leibnizian were the "leibnizians" Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the theory of preestablished harmony

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The philosophies of Wolff and Baumgarten have been traditionally evaluated as mere systematizations of the doctrines of Leibniz, and, therefore, as lacking all originality. The paper revises that opinion, focusing on the specific problem of the interaction of natural substances, in order to show that they do not follow Leibniz as closely with respect to some of the central principles of pre-established harmony. It also questions the use of "Leibnizianism" as a label to refer to a homogeneous and undifferentiated body of doctrines.

Translated title of the contributionHow leibnizian were the "leibnizians" Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the theory of preestablished harmony
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)107-135
Number of pages29
JournalIdeas y Valores
Volume63
Issue number154
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How leibnizian were the "leibnizians" Ch. Wolff and A. G. Baumgarten? Reflections on the theory of preestablished harmony'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this