Public Health

  • Raul Gonzalez-Gomez
  • , Hernan Hernandez
  • , Joaquín Migeot
  • , Josephine Cruzat
  • , Agustina Legaz
  • , Sol Fittipaldi
  • , Marcelo Adrian Maito
  • , Vicente Medel
  • , Enzo Tagliazucchi
  • , Pablo Barttfeld
  • , Daniel Franco O'Byrne
  • , Ana Maria Castro Laguardia
  • , José Alberto Ávila Funes
  • , María Isabel Behrens
  • , Nilton Custodio
  • , Temitope Hannah Farombi
  • , Adolfo M. Garcia
  • , Indira Ruth Garcia Cordero
  • , Maria Eugenia Godoy
  • , Cecilia Gonzalez Campo
  • Kun Hu, Brian Lawlor, Maira Okada de Oliveira, Stefanie Pina-Escudero, Katherine L. Possin, Elisa de Paula, França Resende, Pablo A. Reyes, Andrea Slachevsky, Leonel Tadao Takada, Victor Valcour, Robert Whelan, Görsev Yener, Jennifer S. Yokoyama, Carlos Coronel-Oliveros, Agustin Ibanez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While education is crucial for brain health, evidence mainly relies on individual measures of years of education (YoE), neglecting educational quality (EQ). Whether YoE and EQ have complementary impacts on aging and dementia is unknown. METHODS: We assessed the impact of EQ and YoE on brain health in 7,533 subjects from 20 countries, including healthy controls (HCs), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). EQ was based on country-level quality indicators. After applying neuroimage harmonization, we examined their effect on gray matter volume and functional connectivity. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, and cognition, controlling for multiple comparisons. The impact of image quality was controlled through sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Less EQ and YoE were associated with greater brain burden across groups. However, EQ had a stronger impact, mainly targeting the vulnerable areas of each condition. At the whole-brain level, EQ influenced atrophy (HCs: ∆mean = 2.0 [1.9-2.0] CL95 × 10-2, p < 10-5; AD: ∆mean = 0.1 [-0.0-0.3] CL95 × 10-2, p = 0.18; FTLD: ∆mean = 3.5 [3.0-4.0] CL95 × 10-2, p < 10-5) and networks (HCs: ∆mean = 13.5 [13.2-13.7] CL95 × 10-2, p < 10-5; AD: ∆mean = 5.9 [5.2-6.7] CL95 × 10-2, p < 10-5; FTLD: ∆mean = 13.2 [11.2-13.7] CL95 × 10-2, p < 10-5), 1.3 to 7.0 times more than YoE. CONCLUSION: Results support the need to incorporate education quality to study and improve brain health, underscoring the importance of country-level measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e100844
JournalAlzheimer's and Dementia
Volume21
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public Health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this