Noise-driven multistability vs deterministic chaos in phenomenological semi-empirical models of whole-brain activity

Juan Piccinini, Ignacio Perez Ipinña, Helmut Laufs, Morten Kringelbach, Gustavo Deco, Yonatan Sanz Perl, Enzo Tagliazucchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


An outstanding open problem in neuroscience is to understand how neural systems are capable of producing and sustaining complex spatiotemporal dynamics. Computational models that combine local dynamics with in vivo measurements of anatomical and functional connectivity can be used to test potential mechanisms underlying this complexity. We compared two conceptually different mechanisms: Noise-driven switching between equilibrium solutions (modeled by coupled Stuart-Landau oscillators) and deterministic chaos (modeled by coupled Rossler oscillators). We found that both models struggled to simultaneously reproduce multiple observables computed from the empirical data. This issue was especially manifested in the case of noise-driven dynamics close to a bifurcation, which imposed overly strong constraints on the optimal model parameters. In contrast, the chaotic model could produce complex behavior over a range of parameters, thus being capable of capturing multiple observables at the same time with good performance. Our observations support the view of the brain as a non-equilibrium system able to produce endogenous variability. We presented a simple model capable of jointly reproducing functional connectivity computed at different temporal scales. Besides adding to our conceptual understanding of brain complexity, our results inform and constrain the future development of biophysically realistic large-scale models.

Original languageEnglish
Article number023127
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2021
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Noise-driven multistability vs deterministic chaos in phenomenological semi-empirical models of whole-brain activity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this