Migration governance in South America: regional approaches versus national laws

Victoria Finn, Cristián Doña-Reveco, Mayra Feddersen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Regional Consultative Processes (RCPs) have become the standard for multilateral migration policy discussion over the last two decades. RCPs are geographically bounded, non-binding meetings organized voluntarily by states and promoted by international organizations. This chapter contributes to accumulating knowledge regarding the migration governance role of RCPs by investigating the South American Conference on Migration (CSM). We conduct a thematic analysis of CSM documents from its first annual meeting in 2000 until 2017 to find the most salient themes. We then examine migration-related legislation to uncover to what extent national laws incorporate regional discussion and accords. We find that, although multilateral cooperation has created a set of common standards and practices, their domestic incorporation remains uneven. This chapter sheds light on the synergy between regional-level priorities and national-level laws, revealing a limitation of regional migration governance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Dynamics of Regional Migration Governance
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Pages36-53
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781788119948
ISBN (Print)9781788119931
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Migration governance in South America: regional approaches versus national laws'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this