TY - JOUR
T1 - Methodological nationalism and the domestic analogy
T2 - Classical resources for their critique
AU - Chernilo, Daniel
N1 - Funding Information:
This article is part of a wider research project into the relationship between social theory and natural law that receives financial support from the Chilean Council for Science and Technology (Grant 1080213). My gratitude to José Maurício Domingues and Frederic Vandenberghe for inviting me to present this paper at IUPERJ’s Theory Forum in Rio de Janeiro in December 2008. My thanks also to William Outhwaite for suggesting my name to the editors of this forum, George Lawson and Robbie Shilliam, whose extraordinary editorial work went well beyond the call of duty. As ever, I am deeply indebted to Robert Fine for comments to an early version of this article and beyond.
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - The critique of methodological nationalism arose in the 1970s in sociology, but it only gained salience with the rise of globalization theory in the late 1990s. This article argues that in International Relations the discussion of the so-called 'domestic analogy' is closely connected to the one on methodological nationalism as they equally point to the substantive problem of understanding the nation state's position in modernity. The first section of this article revisits the three waves of the debate on methodological nationalism in sociology. The second part connects this with the discussion in IR on the domestic analogy. The last section brings the two disciplinary strands together by suggesting that social theory's claimto universalism is a fundamental resource to theorize current global processes beyond methodological nationalism and the domestic analogy. But for us to do so, we still have to unpack social theory's ambivalent relationship with the natural law tradition.
AB - The critique of methodological nationalism arose in the 1970s in sociology, but it only gained salience with the rise of globalization theory in the late 1990s. This article argues that in International Relations the discussion of the so-called 'domestic analogy' is closely connected to the one on methodological nationalism as they equally point to the substantive problem of understanding the nation state's position in modernity. The first section of this article revisits the three waves of the debate on methodological nationalism in sociology. The second part connects this with the discussion in IR on the domestic analogy. The last section brings the two disciplinary strands together by suggesting that social theory's claimto universalism is a fundamental resource to theorize current global processes beyond methodological nationalism and the domestic analogy. But for us to do so, we still have to unpack social theory's ambivalent relationship with the natural law tradition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956166460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09557570903433654
DO - 10.1080/09557570903433654
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79956166460
SN - 0955-7571
VL - 23
SP - 87
EP - 106
JO - Cambridge Review of International Affairs
JF - Cambridge Review of International Affairs
IS - 1
ER -