Mano invisible, cláusulas lockeanas y justicia privada: Emergencia y justificación del Estado en Anarquía, Estado y utopía

Translated title of the contribution: Invisible-hand, lockean provisos and private justice: Emergence and state’s legitimacy in anarchy, state and utopia

Felipe Schwember Augier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This work analyses the argument provided by Nozick in support of the State’s legitimacy. It will be held that, in fact, this argument deals with two different difficulties: a descriptive one (the harmless and unintended emergence of the State) and another de jure (the legitimacy of the State). The first one is resolved by Nozick via the invisible-hand explanation, and the second one via so-called principle of compensation. I will attempt to demonstrate that this principle is consistent with Locke’s political philosophy and, therefore, with lockean libertarianism.

Translated title of the contributionInvisible-hand, lockean provisos and private justice: Emergence and state’s legitimacy in anarchy, state and utopia
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)409-426
Number of pages18
JournalRevista de Ciencia Politica
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Invisible-hand, lockean provisos and private justice: Emergence and state’s legitimacy in anarchy, state and utopia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this