Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Machiavelli: Lucretian Republicanism and Animality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper investigates the relevance of a materialist ontology of Lucretian origin in Machiavelli's conception of animality. It argues that Machiavelli's view of man as another expression of the material world serves as a starting point, where man is an animal urged to overcome his animality through institutions and civic life. Machiavelli's political philosophy can be interpreted as an ontological understanding of society, with a state of war as its foundation. Man is seen as a political animal in the sense of homo homini lupus rather than Aristotle's assumption of a being driven by civic friendship. The inherent conflict in political life arises from the desire of elites to dominate the masses, and only political institutions can bring Seneca's homo sacra res homini to life. For Machiavelli, the sacred is an institutionally guaranteed status resulting from a social and political construction that prevents the powerful from devouring the common people. The paper considers whether this Machiavellian animality gives rise to a new kind of collective phronesis, which seeks to overcome this ‘animality’ as part of a teleology of human materiality.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12599
JournalTheoria (Sweden)
Volume91
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • clinamen
  • freedom
  • people
  • power

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Machiavelli: Lucretian Republicanism and Animality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this