Leibniz against occasionalism and Newtonianism: the objection from perpetual miracles revisited

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Leibniz famously charged occasionalism with entailing perpetual miracles (Objection from Perpetual Miracles = OPM). But he also extended this criticism to Newton’s theory of universal gravitation. Traditionally, scholars have interpreted this twofold application of OPM as stemming from different concerns in each case: while Leibniz’s anti-occasionalist OPM relies on the metaphysical idea that created substances must be endowed with intrinsic causal powers, his anti-Newtonian OPM is based on the claim that action at a distance through empty space is mechanically impossible. This paper proposes that the core of Leibniz’s anti-Newtonian OPM lies elsewhere. Particularly, it is argued that, for Leibniz, OPM undermines Newtonian gravitation for the very same reason that it undermines occasionalism: both stem from an inadequate conception of the laws of nature as mere regularities detached from the causal powers of the entities whose behaviour they seek to describe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-110
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

Keywords

  • Leibniz
  • Newtonian gravitation
  • causal powers
  • occasionalism
  • perpetual miracles

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leibniz against occasionalism and Newtonianism: the objection from perpetual miracles revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this