@article{13aa2f4acde544b797a84adb4b55c581,
title = "La opini{\'o}n de directores de centros p{\'u}blicos y privados sobre las pol{\'i}ticas educativas en Chile",
abstract = "The objective of this article is to compare the opinion of school principals from public and private subsidized schools on relevant topics of educational policy, during a period (2014-2018) in which important educational reforms were implemented in Chile. Based on an annual opinion survey, a descriptive analysis is carried out aimed at investigating the differences between these principals. The comparison between the opinions of both groups shows that, on the one hand, principals share a certain general vision of education and its challenges, visualize the need to improve initial teacher training, agree on the most relevant educational policies to improve quality education, and aspire to a similar leadership career. On the other hand, they show different perspectives with respect to the need for structural changes in the education system, differ in the main initiative of the government of President Bachelet (the {"}law of inclusion{"}), inform about a very different relationship with its administrators, and they pose different priorities and possible policies to enhance the performance of their position. The results obtained allow us to understand the difficulty that the principals of these two subsystems can be constituted as a relevant socio-political player for the educational policies in Chile.",
keywords = "Chile, Educational Policy, Private Schools, Public Schools, School Principals",
author = "Jos{\'e} Weinstein and Gonzalo Mu{\~n}oz and Mat{\'i}as Sembler and Rosario Rivero",
note = "Funding Information: En efecto, los resultados permiten apreciar una correlaci{\'o}n de mayor apoyo o rechazo entre cierto grupo de directivos y determinado gobierno. Es as{\'i} como el a{\~n}o 2013 los directivos del sector municipal eran m{\'a}s cr{\'i}ticos del gobierno de Pi{\~n}era: 37.3% le pon{\'i}a una nota roja, entre 1 y 3, al consult{\'a}rsele respecto de c{\'o}mo calificaba el aporte del gobierno al mejoramiento de la calidad y equidad de la educaci{\'o}n chilena (contra un 22.9% de sus colegas privados). Sin embargo, la situaci{\'o}n se invierte con la llegada del gobierno de Michelle Bachelet, tendencia que se mantiene en las distintas evaluaciones realizadas en dicho per{\'i}odo. Por ejemplo, en el a{\~n}o 2017, los directivos que trabajan en establecimientos privados subvencionados evaluaron al gobierno bacheletista con notas de 3.3 en materia de mejoramiento de la calidad y de 4.0 en materia de equidad, mientras que sus colegas del sector p{\'u}blico lo hicieron con notas de 4.2 y de 4.7 respectivamente. Por {\'u}ltimo, el retorno de Sebasti{\'a}n Pi{\~n}era al gobierno se corresponde con que la opini{\'o}n directiva vuelve a girar seg{\'u}n la dependencia, de manera que los directores y directoras del sector municipal vuelven el 2018 a ser m{\'a}s cr{\'i}ticos de las pol{\'i}ticas educativas, volviendo a superar a sus pares del sector privado subvencionado en malas notas en cuanto al aporte gubernamental para la mejora de la calidad y de la equidad. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Grupo de Investigacion FORCE. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.30827/profesorado.v23i2.9285",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "23",
pages = "13--39",
journal = "Profesorado",
issn = "1138-414X",
publisher = "Universidad de Granada",
number = "2",
}
