Interoception in anxiety, depression, and psychosis: a review

Paul M. Jenkinson, Aikaterini Fotopoulou, Agustin Ibañez, Susan Rossell

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research has examined the relationship between interoception and anxiety, depression, and psychosis; however, it is unclear which aspects of interoception have been systematically examined, what the combined findings are, and which areas require further research. To answer these questions, we systematically searched and narratively synthesised relevant reviews, meta-analyses, and theory papers (total n = 34). Existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses (anxiety n = 2; depression n = 2; psychosis n = 0), focus on cardiac interoceptive accuracy (heartbeat perception), and indicate that heartbeat perception is not systematically impaired in anxiety or depression. Heartbeat perception might be poorer in people with psychosis, but further evidence is needed. Other aspects of interoception, such as different body systems and processing levels, have been studied but not systematically reviewed. We highlight studies examining these alternative bodily domains and levels, review the efficacy of interoception-based psychological interventions, and make suggestions for future research. Funding: Wellcome Trust UK.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102673
JournaleClinicalMedicine
Volume73
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Interoception
  • Mental health
  • Psychosis
  • Transdiagnostic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interoception in anxiety, depression, and psychosis: a review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this