TY - JOUR
T1 - International consensus for the assessment of social cognition in neurocognitive disorders
T2 - framework definition and clinical recommendations of the SIGNATURE initiative
AU - SIGNATURE Consortium
AU - Dodich, Alessandra
AU - Panzavolta, Andrea
AU - Funghi, Giulia
AU - Meli, Claudia
AU - Festari, Cristina
AU - Chatzikostopoulos, Thanos
AU - Chicherio, Christian
AU - Clarens, Florencia
AU - de Oliveira, Fabricio Ferreira
AU - Filardi, Marco
AU - Ibanez, Agustin
AU - Invernizzi, Laura
AU - Lebouvier, Thibaud
AU - Logroscino, Giancarlo
AU - MacPherson, Sarah E.
AU - Manca, Riccardo
AU - Marra, Camillo
AU - Matias-Guiu, Jordi A.
AU - Montembeault, Maxime
AU - Papagno, Costanza
AU - Pomati, Simone
AU - Possenti, Mario
AU - Piguet, Olivier
AU - Sacco, Leonardo
AU - Schild, Ann Katrin
AU - Sollberger, Marc
AU - Tábuas-Pereira, Miguel
AU - Tsatali, Marianna
AU - Tsolaki, Magda
AU - van den Berg, Esther
AU - Cappa, Stefano F.
AU - Bertoux, Maxime
AU - Kumfor, Fiona
AU - Van den Stock, Jan
AU - Boccardi, Marina
AU - Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen Anne
AU - Cerami, Chiara
AU - Bradshaw, Angela
AU - Oksengard, Anne Rita
AU - Pezzati, Rita
AU - Briales, Helena
AU - Weidner, Wendy
AU - Zimmermann, Nikki
AU - Strijkert, Fijanne
AU - Ruiu, Elisa
AU - Dogdu, Cem
AU - Isernia, Sara
AU - Baglio, Francesca
AU - Geurtsen, Gert
AU - Bartels, Claudia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2026/12
Y1 - 2026/12
N2 - Background: Socio-cognitive assessment in neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) is rare in clinical practice and no consensus exists as to a uniform operationalization of socio-cognitive measures for NCDs in memory clinics. The SIGNATURE initiative aims to optimize the use of socio-cognitive measures in memory clinics, defining expert recommendations. We report consortium guidelines for the use of socio-cognitive measures in NCDs based on available evidence from the literature and the current state of practices in memory clinics. Methods: Using a Delphi consensus method supported by a literature review and the results of an international survey, 22 specialists defined recommendations for the context of use, relevance in NCD diagnosis, priorities for future research and facilitators/obstacles of socio-cognitive assessment in major and mild NCDs. Results: Overall, panelists recommended social cognition testing in routine diagnostic assessment to evaluate both socio-cognitive and socio-behavioral alterations. A set of clinical, methodological, implementation and external factors facilitating or hampering the use of socio-cognitive tasks was identified. Conclusions: This is the first focused endeavor to favor the implementation of socio-cognitive assessment, which is required by DSM-5 but seldom performed despite clear evidence of its clinical relevance for diagnosis and care. Our results provide an initial set of recommendations, refinable through the future actions of the SIGNATURE initiative. Future collaborative clinical research projects should overcome current limitations and foster the use of ecological and cross-culturally validated measures in clinics.
AB - Background: Socio-cognitive assessment in neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) is rare in clinical practice and no consensus exists as to a uniform operationalization of socio-cognitive measures for NCDs in memory clinics. The SIGNATURE initiative aims to optimize the use of socio-cognitive measures in memory clinics, defining expert recommendations. We report consortium guidelines for the use of socio-cognitive measures in NCDs based on available evidence from the literature and the current state of practices in memory clinics. Methods: Using a Delphi consensus method supported by a literature review and the results of an international survey, 22 specialists defined recommendations for the context of use, relevance in NCD diagnosis, priorities for future research and facilitators/obstacles of socio-cognitive assessment in major and mild NCDs. Results: Overall, panelists recommended social cognition testing in routine diagnostic assessment to evaluate both socio-cognitive and socio-behavioral alterations. A set of clinical, methodological, implementation and external factors facilitating or hampering the use of socio-cognitive tasks was identified. Conclusions: This is the first focused endeavor to favor the implementation of socio-cognitive assessment, which is required by DSM-5 but seldom performed despite clear evidence of its clinical relevance for diagnosis and care. Our results provide an initial set of recommendations, refinable through the future actions of the SIGNATURE initiative. Future collaborative clinical research projects should overcome current limitations and foster the use of ecological and cross-culturally validated measures in clinics.
KW - Cognitive Assessment
KW - Neurocognitive disorders
KW - Recommendations
KW - Social cognition
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105027099965
U2 - 10.1186/s13195-025-01908-2
DO - 10.1186/s13195-025-01908-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 41350737
AN - SCOPUS:105027099965
SN - 1758-9193
VL - 18
JO - Alzheimer's Research and Therapy
JF - Alzheimer's Research and Therapy
IS - 1
M1 - 6
ER -