Abstract
This paper analyses the atypical torts theory and the legal disposition theory that has been formulated by Atienza and Ruiz Manero in 'Ilicitos Atipicos' and 'Las Piezas del Derecho'. Specifically, it is studied how the atypical torts theory darkens their legal disposition theory. The thesis that holds is that the atypical torts theory is a theory of legal interpretation related to the construction of implicit exceptions. It is concluded that the authors should make explicit their theory of legal interpretation.
| Translated title of the contribution | Atypical torts: A critic |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Article number | 0192 |
| Pages (from-to) | 192-206 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Ius et Praxis |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Apr 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Atypical torts: A critic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver