TY - JOUR
T1 - From ancient Greece to the cognitive revolution
T2 - A comprehensive view of physical rehabilitation sciences
AU - Martínez-Pernía, David
AU - González-Castán, Óscar
AU - Huepe, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - The development of rehabilitation has traditionally focused on measurements of motor disorders and measurements of the improvements produced during the therapeutic process; however, physical rehabilitation sciences have not focused on understanding the philosophical and scientific principles in clinical intervention and how they are interrelated. The main aim of this paper is to explain the foundation stones of the disciplines of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech/language therapy in recovery from motor disorder. To reach our goals, the mechanistic view and how it is integrated into physical rehabilitation will first be explained. Next, a classification into mechanistic therapy based on an old version (automaton model) and a technological version (cyborg model) will be shown. Then, it will be shown how physical rehabilitation sciences found a new perspective in motor recovery, which is based on functionalism, during the cognitive revolution in the 1960s. Through this cognitive theory, physical rehabilitation incorporated into motor recovery of those therapeutic strategies that solicit the activation of the brain and/or symbolic processing; aspects that were not taken into account in mechanistic therapy. In addition, a classification into functionalist rehabilitation based on a computational therapy and a brain therapy will be shown. At the end of the article, the methodological principles in physical rehabilitation sciences will be explained. It will allow us to go deeper into the differences and similarities between therapeutic mechanism and therapeutic functionalism.
AB - The development of rehabilitation has traditionally focused on measurements of motor disorders and measurements of the improvements produced during the therapeutic process; however, physical rehabilitation sciences have not focused on understanding the philosophical and scientific principles in clinical intervention and how they are interrelated. The main aim of this paper is to explain the foundation stones of the disciplines of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech/language therapy in recovery from motor disorder. To reach our goals, the mechanistic view and how it is integrated into physical rehabilitation will first be explained. Next, a classification into mechanistic therapy based on an old version (automaton model) and a technological version (cyborg model) will be shown. Then, it will be shown how physical rehabilitation sciences found a new perspective in motor recovery, which is based on functionalism, during the cognitive revolution in the 1960s. Through this cognitive theory, physical rehabilitation incorporated into motor recovery of those therapeutic strategies that solicit the activation of the brain and/or symbolic processing; aspects that were not taken into account in mechanistic therapy. In addition, a classification into functionalist rehabilitation based on a computational therapy and a brain therapy will be shown. At the end of the article, the methodological principles in physical rehabilitation sciences will be explained. It will allow us to go deeper into the differences and similarities between therapeutic mechanism and therapeutic functionalism.
KW - Functionalist rehabilitation
KW - history of physical rehabilitation
KW - mechanistic rehabilitation
KW - philosophy of physical rehabilitation
KW - physical rehabilitation sciences
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009223618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09593985.2016.1266720
DO - 10.1080/09593985.2016.1266720
M3 - Article
C2 - 28071974
AN - SCOPUS:85009223618
SN - 0959-3985
VL - 33
SP - 89
EP - 102
JO - Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
JF - Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
IS - 2
ER -