TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of a Genetic Risk Score to Improve Risk Prediction for Alzheimer's Disease
AU - Chouraki, Vincent
AU - Reitz, Christiane
AU - Maury, Fleur
AU - Bis, Joshua C.
AU - Bellenguez, Celine
AU - Yu, Lei
AU - Jakobsdottir, Johanna
AU - Mukherjee, Shubhabrata
AU - Adams, Hieab H.
AU - Choi, Seung Hoan
AU - Larson, Eric B.
AU - Fitzpatrick, Annette
AU - Uitterlinden, Andre G.
AU - De Jager, Philip L.
AU - Hofman, Albert
AU - Gudnason, Vilmundur
AU - Vardarajan, Badri
AU - Ibrahim-Verbaas, Carla
AU - Van Der Lee, Sven J.
AU - Lopez, Oscar
AU - Dartigues, Jean François
AU - Berr, Claudine
AU - Amouyel, Philippe
AU - Bennett, David A.
AU - Van Duijn, Cornelia
AU - Destefano, Anita L.
AU - Launer, Lenore J.
AU - Ikram, M. Arfan
AU - Crane, Paul K.
AU - Lambert, Jean Charles
AU - Mayeux, Richard
AU - Seshadri, Sudha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Effective prevention of Alzheimer's disease (AD) requires the development of risk prediction tools permitting preclinical intervention. We constructed a genetic risk score (GRS) comprising common genetic variants associated with AD, evaluated its association with incident AD and assessed its capacity to improve risk prediction over traditional models based on age, sex, education, and APOE ϵ4. In eight prospective cohorts included in the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP), we derived weighted sum of risk alleles from the 19 top SNPs reported by the IGAP GWAS in participants aged 65 and older without prevalent dementia. Hazard ratios (HR) of incident AD were estimated in Cox models. Improvement in risk prediction was measured by the difference in C-index (Δ-C), the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI>0). Overall, 19,687 participants at risk were included, of whom 2,782 developed AD. The GRS was associated with a 17 increase in AD risk (pooled HR=1.17; 95 CI= [1.13-1.21] per standard deviation increase in GRS; p-value= 2.86×10-16). This association was stronger among persons with at least one APOE ϵ4 allele (HRGRS=1.24; 95 CI= [1.15-1.34]) than in others (HRGRS=1.13; 95 CI= [1.08-1.18]; pinteraction=3.45×10-2). Risk prediction after seven years of follow-up showed a small improvement when adding the GRS to age, sex, APOE ϵ4, and education (Δ-Cindex= 0.0043 [0.0019-0.0067]). Similar patterns were observed for IDI and NRI>0. In conclusion, a risk score incorporating common genetic variation outside the APOE ϵ4 locus improved AD risk prediction and may facilitate risk stratification for prevention trials.
AB - Effective prevention of Alzheimer's disease (AD) requires the development of risk prediction tools permitting preclinical intervention. We constructed a genetic risk score (GRS) comprising common genetic variants associated with AD, evaluated its association with incident AD and assessed its capacity to improve risk prediction over traditional models based on age, sex, education, and APOE ϵ4. In eight prospective cohorts included in the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP), we derived weighted sum of risk alleles from the 19 top SNPs reported by the IGAP GWAS in participants aged 65 and older without prevalent dementia. Hazard ratios (HR) of incident AD were estimated in Cox models. Improvement in risk prediction was measured by the difference in C-index (Δ-C), the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI>0). Overall, 19,687 participants at risk were included, of whom 2,782 developed AD. The GRS was associated with a 17 increase in AD risk (pooled HR=1.17; 95 CI= [1.13-1.21] per standard deviation increase in GRS; p-value= 2.86×10-16). This association was stronger among persons with at least one APOE ϵ4 allele (HRGRS=1.24; 95 CI= [1.15-1.34]) than in others (HRGRS=1.13; 95 CI= [1.08-1.18]; pinteraction=3.45×10-2). Risk prediction after seven years of follow-up showed a small improvement when adding the GRS to age, sex, APOE ϵ4, and education (Δ-Cindex= 0.0043 [0.0019-0.0067]). Similar patterns were observed for IDI and NRI>0. In conclusion, a risk score incorporating common genetic variation outside the APOE ϵ4 locus improved AD risk prediction and may facilitate risk stratification for prevention trials.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - IGAP
KW - clinical utility
KW - cohort studies
KW - genetic risk score
KW - meta-analysis
KW - risk prediction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981351563&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/JAD-150749
DO - 10.3233/JAD-150749
M3 - Article
C2 - 27340842
AN - SCOPUS:84981351563
SN - 1387-2877
VL - 53
SP - 921
EP - 932
JO - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
JF - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
IS - 3
ER -