ESTUDIOS SOBRE INJUSTICIA EPISTÉMICA: UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE LA LITERATURA ACADÉMICA EN ESPAÑOL

Iván E. Gómez Aguilar; Ángeles Eraña; Siobhan Guerrero Mc Manus; Adriana Murguía; Miriam Jerade; Marcia Villanueva Lozano; Andrés F. Villamil Lozano; Harol David Villamil Lozano; Diana M. Rojas Velázquez; Aldo Federico Palafox Hernández; Luis C. Andrade

doi:10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2025.1761

ESTUDIOS SOBRE INJUSTICIA EPISTÉMICA: UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE LA LITERATURA ACADÉMICA EN ESPAÑOL

Translated title of the contribution: Studies on epistemic injustice: A systematic review of the academic literature in Spanish

Iván E. Gómez Aguilar
, Ángeles Eraña
, Siobhan Guerrero Mc Manus
, Adriana Murguía
, Miriam Jerade
, Marcia Villanueva Lozano
, Andrés F. Villamil Lozano
, Harol David Villamil Lozano
, Diana M. Rojas Velázquez
, Aldo Federico Palafox Hernández
, Luis C. Andrade

Faculty of Liberal Arts

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We present a review of 82 texts on epistemic injustice written in Spanish and published between 2016 and 2025. These works were classified into two discussion strands: conceptual contributions to Miranda Fricker’s approach, and case studies on epistemic injustice. We show that the former refine, expand or criticize the original approach, while the latter focus on areas such as socio-political processes, law, education, feminism, and health. We conclude that, paradoxically, despite the value of identified contributions, the works do not have the same resonance within discussions of epistemic injustice written in Spanish.

Translated title of the contribution	Studies on epistemic injustice: A systematic review of the academic literature in Spanish
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	207-242
Number of pages	36
Journal	Critica-Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia
Volume	57
Issue number	171
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2025.1761
State	Published - Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 5 Gender Equality

Access to Document

10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2025.1761

Cite this

Gómez Aguilar, I. E., Eraña, Á., Mc Manus, S. G., Murguía, A., Jerade, M., Lozano, M. V., Villamil Lozano, A. F., Lozano, H. D. V., Rojas Velázquez, D. M., Hernández, A. F. P., & Andrade, L. C. (2025). ESTUDIOS SOBRE INJUSTICIA EPISTÉMICA: UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE LA LITERATURA ACADÉMICA EN ESPAÑOL. Critica-Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia, 57(171), 207-242. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2025.1761

@article{80562b1f69744456bc14341884ba0235,

title = "ESTUDIOS SOBRE INJUSTICIA EPIST{\'E}MICA: UNA REVISI{\'O}N SISTEM{\'A}TICA DE LA LITERATURA ACAD{\'E}MICA EN ESPA{\~N}OL",

abstract = "We present a review of 82 texts on epistemic injustice written in Spanish and published between 2016 and 2025. These works were classified into two discussion strands: conceptual contributions to Miranda Fricker{\textquoteright}s approach, and case studies on epistemic injustice. We show that the former refine, expand or criticize the original approach, while the latter focus on areas such as socio-political processes, law, education, feminism, and health. We conclude that, paradoxically, despite the value of identified contributions, the works do not have the same resonance within discussions of epistemic injustice written in Spanish.",

keywords = "Latin American philosophy, applied social epistemology, epistemic injustice, philosophy in Spanish, social epistemology",

author = "\{G{\'o}mez Aguilar\}, \{Iv{\'a}n E.\} and {\'A}ngeles Era{\~n}a and \{Mc Manus\}, \{Siobhan Guerrero\} and Adriana Murgu{\'i}a and Miriam Jerade and Lozano, \{Marcia Villanueva\} and \{Villamil Lozano\}, \{Andr{\'e}s F.\} and Lozano, \{Harol David Villamil\} and \{Rojas Vel{\'a}zquez\}, \{Diana M.\} and Hern{\'a}ndez, \{Aldo Federico Palafox\} and Andrade, \{Luis C.\}",

year = "2025",

month = dec,

doi = "10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2025.1761",

language = "Spanish",

volume = "57",

pages = "207--242",

journal = "Critica-Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia",

issn = "0011-1503",

publisher = "Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosoficas",

number = "171",

}

Gómez Aguilar, IE, Eraña, Á, Mc Manus, SG, Murguía, A, Jerade, M, Lozano, MV, Villamil Lozano, AF, Lozano, HDV, Rojas Velázquez, DM, Hernández, AFP & Andrade, LC 2025, 'ESTUDIOS SOBRE INJUSTICIA EPISTÉMICA: UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE LA LITERATURA ACADÉMICA EN ESPAÑOL', Critica-Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia, vol. 57, no. 171, pp. 207-242. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2025.1761

TY - JOUR

T1 - ESTUDIOS SOBRE INJUSTICIA EPISTÉMICA

T2 - UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE LA LITERATURA ACADÉMICA EN ESPAÑOL

AU - Gómez Aguilar, Iván E.

AU - Eraña, Ángeles

AU - Mc Manus, Siobhan Guerrero

AU - Murguía, Adriana

AU - Jerade, Miriam

AU - Lozano, Marcia Villanueva

AU - Villamil Lozano, Andrés F.

AU - Lozano, Harol David Villamil

AU - Rojas Velázquez, Diana M.

AU - Hernández, Aldo Federico Palafox

AU - Andrade, Luis C.

PY - 2025/12

Y1 - 2025/12

N2 - We present a review of 82 texts on epistemic injustice written in Spanish and published between 2016 and 2025. These works were classified into two discussion strands: conceptual contributions to Miranda Fricker’s approach, and case studies on epistemic injustice. We show that the former refine, expand or criticize the original approach, while the latter focus on areas such as socio-political processes, law, education, feminism, and health. We conclude that, paradoxically, despite the value of identified contributions, the works do not have the same resonance within discussions of epistemic injustice written in Spanish.

AB - We present a review of 82 texts on epistemic injustice written in Spanish and published between 2016 and 2025. These works were classified into two discussion strands: conceptual contributions to Miranda Fricker’s approach, and case studies on epistemic injustice. We show that the former refine, expand or criticize the original approach, while the latter focus on areas such as socio-political processes, law, education, feminism, and health. We conclude that, paradoxically, despite the value of identified contributions, the works do not have the same resonance within discussions of epistemic injustice written in Spanish.

KW - Latin American philosophy

KW - applied social epistemology

KW - epistemic injustice

KW - philosophy in Spanish

KW - social epistemology

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105029395367

U2 - 10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2025.1761

DO - 10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2025.1761

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:105029395367

SN - 0011-1503

VL - 57

SP - 207

EP - 242

JO - Critica-Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia

JF - Critica-Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia

IS - 171

ER -

ESTUDIOS SOBRE INJUSTICIA EPISTÉMICA: UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE LA LITERATURA ACADÉMICA EN ESPAÑOL

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this