Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Environmental life cycle assessment of novel PV systems for desert conditions

  • Jose Maria Cruz
  • , Ximena Schmidt Rivera
  • , Francisca Jalil-Vega
  • , Raúl O'Ryan
  • , Felipe Valencia
  • , Jorge Rabanal-Arabach
  • , Eduardo Ayllón Opazo
  • , Paulina Andrea Morris Carmona
  • , Patricio Larrain Yañez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are currently seen as an affordable and mainstream renewable energy option to support energy decarbonisation, aligning with commitments of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 7). This technology prevails in high irradiance places such as deserts, where some of the largest PV systems are installed globally. However, harsh desert conditions reduce PV systems' efficiency and lifespan, among other negative effects. While research on designing PV systems that endure desert conditions is ongoing, little is known about the environmental impacts of these novel PV solutions. This study uses the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to assess the environmental impacts of four novel PV system designs (HJT 1–4) for desert conditions and compares them with three systems available in the current market (PERC, PERC+ and TOPCon). The functional unit of the study is ‘the production of 1 kWh of electricity AC, considering a PV system connected to a 570kWp grid in the Atacama Desert with a lifespan of 25 years’. The inventories were built using data from tested designs in the desert. 18 environmental impact indicators were included following ReCiPe method, and complemented with energy payback time (EPBT). Results show that the novel design (HJT 3) achieves up to 30% reduction in GWP100 per kWh of electricity generated compared to conventional monofacial PERC modules, and a 15% reduction compared to TOPCon modules, primarily due to higher efficiency and reduced materials consumption. The Balance of System (BOS) and installation stage shows the greatest impact on PV systems, contributing 46% on average across all environmental burden, followed by the wafer manufacturing (25% on average) and module manufacturing stages (18% on average). Across all impact categories, including EPBT, PERC is the worst performer, and HJT 3 and HJT 4 are the best performers, followed by TOPCon. This study validates the effort of performing environmental impact assessments on new designs, to ensure both technical performance and the environmental and economic sustainability of renewable energy systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-129
Number of pages15
JournalSustainable Production and Consumption
Volume65
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • Carbon footprint
  • LCA
  • Renewable energy
  • Solar energy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental life cycle assessment of novel PV systems for desert conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this