Abstract
The objective of this paper is to examine the recycling rates for mechanical and thermochemical recycling of postconsumer polyethylene flexible packaging after the implementation of different policy instruments. The study uses a supply chain equilibrium model that incorporates market data and techno-economic assessments to simulate market equilibrium. It combines this with a life cycle assessment to explore the environmental implications of implementing different policy instruments. The results show that instruments that do not target a specific technology are more likely to increase thermochemical recycling than mechanical recycling. Furthermore, a higher recycling rate is not equivalent to a better environmental outcome. An increased collection target that ensures a supply of plastic waste would increase the overall recycling rates the most. A recycled content standard for mechanical recycling would lead to the highest increase in mechanical recycling, with top results for environmental indicators, but low results for economic indicators.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 107519 |
| Journal | Resources, Conservation and Recycling |
| Volume | 204 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Mechanical recycling
- Plastic waste
- Recycled content
- Recycling target
- Supply chain equilibrium model
- Tax
- Thermochemical recycling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Economic and environmental implications of policy instruments for the circular economy: A case study for postconsumer polyethylene film recycling in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver