TY - JOUR
T1 - Demographic predictors of objectification theory and tripartite influence model constructs
T2 - The U.S. Body Project I
AU - Frederick, David A.
AU - Pila, Eva
AU - Malcarne, Vanessa L.
AU - Compte, Emilio J.
AU - Nagata, Jason M.
AU - Best, Cassidy R.
AU - Cook-Cottone, Catherine P.
AU - Brown, Tiffany A.
AU - Convertino, Lexie
AU - Crerand, Canice E.
AU - Parent, Michael C.
AU - Pennesi, Jamie Lee
AU - Perez, Marisol
AU - Rodgers, Rachel F.
AU - Schaefer, Lauren M.
AU - Thompson, J. Kevin
AU - Tylka, Tracy L.
AU - Murray, Stuart B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - We examined how demographic factors (gender, sexual orientation, racial group, age, body mass) were linked to measures of sociocultural appearance concerns derived from objectification theory and the tripartite influence model (McKinley & Hyde, 1996; Schaefer et al., 2015) among 11,620 adults. Men were less likely than women to report high body surveillance, thin-ideal internalization, appearance-related media pressures, and family pressures; did not differ in peer pressures; and reported greater muscle/athletic internalization. Both men and women expressed greater desire for their bodies to look “very lean” than to look “very thin”. Compared to gay men, heterosexual men reported lower body surveillance, thin-ideal internalization, peer pressures, and media pressures. Black women reported lower thin-ideal internalization than White, Hispanic, and Asian women, whereas Asian women reported greater family pressures. Being younger and having higher BMIs were associated with greater sociocultural appearance concerns across most measures. The variation in prevalence of sociocultural appearance concerns across these demographic groups highlights the need for interventions.
AB - We examined how demographic factors (gender, sexual orientation, racial group, age, body mass) were linked to measures of sociocultural appearance concerns derived from objectification theory and the tripartite influence model (McKinley & Hyde, 1996; Schaefer et al., 2015) among 11,620 adults. Men were less likely than women to report high body surveillance, thin-ideal internalization, appearance-related media pressures, and family pressures; did not differ in peer pressures; and reported greater muscle/athletic internalization. Both men and women expressed greater desire for their bodies to look “very lean” than to look “very thin”. Compared to gay men, heterosexual men reported lower body surveillance, thin-ideal internalization, peer pressures, and media pressures. Black women reported lower thin-ideal internalization than White, Hispanic, and Asian women, whereas Asian women reported greater family pressures. Being younger and having higher BMIs were associated with greater sociocultural appearance concerns across most measures. The variation in prevalence of sociocultural appearance concerns across these demographic groups highlights the need for interventions.
KW - Body image
KW - Gender
KW - Objectification theory
KW - Sexual orientation
KW - Tripartite influence model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122011092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.12.012
DO - 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.12.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122011092
SN - 1740-1445
VL - 40
SP - 182
EP - 199
JO - Body Image
JF - Body Image
ER -