Criterios que supervisores clínicos Chilenos consideran relevantes al momento de supervisar: Un estudio cualitativo

Translated title of the contribution: Criteria Chilean clinical supervisors consider relevant when supervising: A qualitative study

Claudio Araya, Sol Casassus, Cristóbal Guerra, Domingo Salvo, Johana Zapata, Mariane Krause

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article presents the results of a qualitative study focused on describing the experience of supervision from the supervisors' perspective. The aim of the research is to determine criteria by which supervisors describe what they do, and the meanings associated with their own work. Participants were eleven supervisors, from different theoretical orientations, accredited by the Chilean Society for Clinical Psychology. Data collection was performed through semi-structured interviews that were transcribed textually and analyzed with procedures of Grounded Theory. Results describe, as principal phenomenon, a multifocal vision where the supervisors pay attention simultaneously to different aspects (supervisee, patient, supervisor-supervisee relationship and therapist-patient relationship) intending to achieve a dynamic equilibrium while developing the supervisee's clinical skills as well as helping the patient.

Translated title of the contributionCriteria Chilean clinical supervisors consider relevant when supervising: A qualitative study
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)47-58
Number of pages12
JournalRevista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Criteria Chilean clinical supervisors consider relevant when supervising: A qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this