Creators' intentions bias judgments of function independently from causal inferences

Sergio E. Chaigneau, Ramón D. Castillo, Luis Martínez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Participants learned about novel artifacts that were created for function X, but later used for function Y. When asked to rate the extent to which X and Y were a given artifact's function, participants consistently rated X higher than Y. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were also asked to rate artifacts' efficiency to perform X and Y. This allowed us to test if participants' preference for X was mediated by causal inferences. Experiment 1 showed that participants did not infer intentionally created artifacts performed X more efficiently than Y. Experiment 2 showed participants did not infer that only an efficient (but not an inefficient) artifact provided evidence of intentional creation. Causal inferences involving efficiency, did not account for participants' preferences. In Experiment 3, in contrast, when the creator changed her mind about an artifact's function (i.e., from X to Y), the preference for the original function tended to disappear. Creators' intentions were the basis for participants' preference. Results are discussed relative to essentialist theories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-132
Number of pages10
JournalCognition
Volume109
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Keywords

  • Artifacts
  • Essence
  • Function
  • Intention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Creators' intentions bias judgments of function independently from causal inferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this