TY - JOUR
T1 - Competing activists—Political polarization
AU - Böttcher, Lucas
AU - Montealegre, Pedro
AU - Goles, Eric
AU - Gersbach, Hans
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge financial support from the ETH Risk Center, Switzerland and from the Center for Mathematical Modeling (Santiago, Chile) . We thank Hans Herrmann and Moritz Hoferer for helpful comments. PM acknowledges funding from CONICYT, Chile , PAI, Chile , Convocatoria Nacional Subvención a instalación en la academia convocatoria año, Chile 2017 PAI77170068 . EG acknowledges funding from Fondecyt, Chile 1190265 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Recent empirical findings suggest that societies have become more polarized in various countries. That is, the median voter of today represents a smaller fraction of society compared to two decades ago and yet, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not fully understood. Since interactions between influential actors (“activists”) and voters play a major role in opinion formation, e.g. through social media, we develop a macroscopic opinion model in which competing activists spread their political ideas in specific groups of society. These ideas spread further to other groups in declining strength. While unilateral spreading shifts the opinion distribution, competition of activists leads to additional phenomena: Small heterogeneities among competing activists cause them to target different groups in society, which amplifies polarization. For moderate heterogeneities, we obtain target cycles and further amplification of polarization. In such cycles, the stronger activist differentiates himself from the weaker one, while the latter aims to imitate the stronger activist.
AB - Recent empirical findings suggest that societies have become more polarized in various countries. That is, the median voter of today represents a smaller fraction of society compared to two decades ago and yet, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not fully understood. Since interactions between influential actors (“activists”) and voters play a major role in opinion formation, e.g. through social media, we develop a macroscopic opinion model in which competing activists spread their political ideas in specific groups of society. These ideas spread further to other groups in declining strength. While unilateral spreading shifts the opinion distribution, competition of activists leads to additional phenomena: Small heterogeneities among competing activists cause them to target different groups in society, which amplifies polarization. For moderate heterogeneities, we obtain target cycles and further amplification of polarization. In such cycles, the stronger activist differentiates himself from the weaker one, while the latter aims to imitate the stronger activist.
KW - Activists
KW - Game theory
KW - Markov chains
KW - Opinion formation
KW - Political polarization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077705720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123713
DO - 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123713
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077705720
SN - 0378-4371
VL - 545
JO - Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
JF - Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
M1 - 123713
ER -