Abstract
This work aims to determine the existing boundaries between the extrajudicial collection of monetary debts and the judicial collection of these. To this end, it will be defended that both types of collection constitute successive stages and do not overlap temporally. Afterwards, the relevance of this distinction for the regime of legal costs will be analyzed. Specifically, it will be examined whether such costs can be conventionally agreed upon and in what cases the regulation of Law 19,496, which imposes limits on the costs of extrajudicial collection, is applicable to them.
| Translated title of the contribution | Judicial and extrajudicial debt collection and personal costs: A proposal for systematization in consumer law |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 365-389 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Pro Jure Revista de Derecho |
| Volume | 64 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial and extrajudicial debt collection and personal costs: A proposal for systematization in consumer law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver