TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Manifestations
AU - Brown, Gregory
AU - Bustamante-Paytan, Diego
AU - Albujar-Pereira, Maria Fe
AU - Huilca, José Carlos
AU - Agüero, Katherine
AU - Verástegui, Graciet
AU - Yauri, Zadith
AU - Bartolo, Pamela
AU - Bendezu, Daniela
AU - Montesinos, Rosa
AU - Ibanez, Agustin
AU - Custodio, Nilton
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
PY - 2025/12/1
Y1 - 2025/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease requires standardized neuropsychological assessments, adapted and validated for each community. Demographically adjusted normative data are critical for accurate evaluations. The Uniform Data Set (UDS) neuropsychological battery, widely used in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC), is a multi-domain assessment for early dementia detection and tracking. Its standardized design supports cross-site comparability and longitudinal monitoring. However, the UDS has not been validated for populations with low education levels, such as those in Peru. METHODS: We recruited 340 healthy participants (ages 43-79, 70% female), strategically balanced by education level: low (0-6 years, n = 173) and high (≥7 years, n = 167). Participants underwent UDS battery, including number span, trail making, image naming, verbal fluency, figure copying, and story recall. Group comparisons were made using t-tests. Normative values were generated through linear regression, incorporating age, education, and sex as predictors. RESULTS: Participants were well-matched for age (p = 0.970) and sex (p = 0.904) between the low and high education groups. Education emerged as the primary influential factor across all measures, except semantic fluency: vegetables. Age emerged as the second most significant predictor for 68% of the assessments. The largest effect sizes of low education (|Cohen's d|>1) were on backwards digit span, time for trails making A & B, image naming, phonemic fluency, and immediate figure copy and story recall. CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive, demographically stratified normative cognitive data for Peruvian adults. The generated tables are valid for all education levels in Peruvian individuals ranging from 43-79 years of age. Individual t-scores can be determined by calculating the expected score [Scoreexpected = βIntercept + βAge (Age) + βEducation (Education) + βSex (Sex)] and then subtract Scoreexpected from the measured score and divide by the standard deviation of the residuals. We found education to most effect the domains of processing speed, working memory, memory encoding, and word finding. Culturally appropriate normative data is essential for accurate early detection of cognitive impairments. Future work is needed to determine if this data is accurate for other Spanish-speaking South America countries and for patients with cognitive decline and dementia.
AB - BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease requires standardized neuropsychological assessments, adapted and validated for each community. Demographically adjusted normative data are critical for accurate evaluations. The Uniform Data Set (UDS) neuropsychological battery, widely used in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC), is a multi-domain assessment for early dementia detection and tracking. Its standardized design supports cross-site comparability and longitudinal monitoring. However, the UDS has not been validated for populations with low education levels, such as those in Peru. METHODS: We recruited 340 healthy participants (ages 43-79, 70% female), strategically balanced by education level: low (0-6 years, n = 173) and high (≥7 years, n = 167). Participants underwent UDS battery, including number span, trail making, image naming, verbal fluency, figure copying, and story recall. Group comparisons were made using t-tests. Normative values were generated through linear regression, incorporating age, education, and sex as predictors. RESULTS: Participants were well-matched for age (p = 0.970) and sex (p = 0.904) between the low and high education groups. Education emerged as the primary influential factor across all measures, except semantic fluency: vegetables. Age emerged as the second most significant predictor for 68% of the assessments. The largest effect sizes of low education (|Cohen's d|>1) were on backwards digit span, time for trails making A & B, image naming, phonemic fluency, and immediate figure copy and story recall. CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive, demographically stratified normative cognitive data for Peruvian adults. The generated tables are valid for all education levels in Peruvian individuals ranging from 43-79 years of age. Individual t-scores can be determined by calculating the expected score [Scoreexpected = βIntercept + βAge (Age) + βEducation (Education) + βSex (Sex)] and then subtract Scoreexpected from the measured score and divide by the standard deviation of the residuals. We found education to most effect the domains of processing speed, working memory, memory encoding, and word finding. Culturally appropriate normative data is essential for accurate early detection of cognitive impairments. Future work is needed to determine if this data is accurate for other Spanish-speaking South America countries and for patients with cognitive decline and dementia.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025835219
U2 - 10.1002/alz70857_104880
DO - 10.1002/alz70857_104880
M3 - Article
C2 - 41447316
AN - SCOPUS:105025835219
SN - 1552-5260
VL - 21
SP - e104880
JO - Alzheimer's and Dementia
JF - Alzheimer's and Dementia
ER -