Ciencia e iluminación en el comentario a los Analíticos Posteriores de Roberto Grosseteste

Translated title of the contribution: Science and Illumination in Robert Grosseteste’s Posterior Analytics commentary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Tensions between Neoplatonic assumptions and Aristotelian ideas are a common feature in Grosseteste’s work. This article attempts to show how the notion of science in his commentary on Posterior Analytics reflects these tensions in several of his doctrines, laying the theoretical foundations for the elaboration of a theological conception of metaphysics. In its strictest sense, the notion of science seems to suppose that its object is intimately linked to divine exemplars. We will try to verify this from a passage that proposes a foundation of the incorruptibility of the universals that are the object of the demonstrations.

Translated title of the contributionScience and Illumination in Robert Grosseteste’s Posterior Analytics commentary
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)99-142
Number of pages44
JournalScripta Mediaevalia
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 25 Aug 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Science and Illumination in Robert Grosseteste’s Posterior Analytics commentary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this