Abstract
This article critically reviews three of the most significant debates in the sociology of nations and nationalism over the past 50 years: (1) the problem of methodological nationalism on the main features of nation-states; (2) the tension between primordialism and modernism in understanding the historicity of nations; and (3) the politics of nationalism between universalism and particularism. These three debates help us clarify some key theses in our long-term understanding of nations and nationalism: processes of nation and nation-state formation are not opposed to but compatible with the rise of globalisation and non-state forms of governance; the question ‘when is a nation?’ combines modern and pre-modern dimensions; the politics of nationalism is neither unfailingly democratic nor exclusively regressive. A key paradox that unfolds is that all nations invest heavily in the production and reproduction of their own exceptionalism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1072-1087 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Sociology |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2020 |
Keywords
- cosmopolitanism
- globalisation
- methodological nationalism
- modernism
- nation-state
- primordialism