TY - JOUR
T1 - Behavioural insights (BI) for childhood development and effective public policies in Latin America
T2 - A survey and a randomised controlled trial
AU - Tomio, Andrea A.
AU - Dottori, Martin
AU - Hesse, Eugenia
AU - Torrente, Fernando
AU - Flichtentrei, Daniel
AU - Ibanez, Agustin M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2021/8/9
Y1 - 2021/8/9
N2 - Objectives We developed (a) a survey to investigate the knowledge of childhood health experts on public policies and behavioural insights (BI), as well as its use in Latin American and the Caribbean countries (LACs), and (b) an intervention (randomised controlled trial) to test the influence of nudges on the effect of a simulated public health programme communication. Participants and settings A total of 2003 LACs childhood health professionals participated in the study through a Hispanic online platform. Primary and secondary outcomes We used regression models analysing expertise-related information, individual differences and location. We extracted several outcome variables related to (a) Public Policy Knowledge Index' based on the participants' degree of knowledge on childhood health public policies and (b) BI knowledge, perceived effectiveness and usefulness of a simulated public programme communication. We also analysed a Behavioural Insights Knowledge Index' (BIKI) based on participants' performance in BI questions. Results In general, health professionals showed low BI knowledge (knowledge of the term BI: χ 2 =210.29, df=1 and p<0.001; BIKI: χ 2 =160.5, df=1 and p<0.001), and results were modulated by different factors (age, academic formation, public policy knowledge and location). The use of BI principles for the communication of the public programme revealed higher impact and clarity ratings from professionals than control messages. Conclusions Our findings provide relevant knowledge about BI in health professionals to inform governmental and non-governmental organisations' decision-making processes related with childhood public policies and BI designs.
AB - Objectives We developed (a) a survey to investigate the knowledge of childhood health experts on public policies and behavioural insights (BI), as well as its use in Latin American and the Caribbean countries (LACs), and (b) an intervention (randomised controlled trial) to test the influence of nudges on the effect of a simulated public health programme communication. Participants and settings A total of 2003 LACs childhood health professionals participated in the study through a Hispanic online platform. Primary and secondary outcomes We used regression models analysing expertise-related information, individual differences and location. We extracted several outcome variables related to (a) Public Policy Knowledge Index' based on the participants' degree of knowledge on childhood health public policies and (b) BI knowledge, perceived effectiveness and usefulness of a simulated public programme communication. We also analysed a Behavioural Insights Knowledge Index' (BIKI) based on participants' performance in BI questions. Results In general, health professionals showed low BI knowledge (knowledge of the term BI: χ 2 =210.29, df=1 and p<0.001; BIKI: χ 2 =160.5, df=1 and p<0.001), and results were modulated by different factors (age, academic formation, public policy knowledge and location). The use of BI principles for the communication of the public programme revealed higher impact and clarity ratings from professionals than control messages. Conclusions Our findings provide relevant knowledge about BI in health professionals to inform governmental and non-governmental organisations' decision-making processes related with childhood public policies and BI designs.
KW - child protection
KW - health policy
KW - public health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112582070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047925
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047925
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34373303
AN - SCOPUS:85112582070
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 11
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 8
M1 - e047925
ER -