TY - JOUR
T1 - Auditory feedback differentially modulates behavioral and neural markers of objective and subjective performance when tapping to your heartbeat
AU - Canales-Johnson, Andrés
AU - Silva, Carolina
AU - Huepe, David
AU - Rivera-Rei, Álvaro
AU - Noreika, Valdas
AU - Del Carmen Garcia, María
AU - Silva, Walter
AU - Ciraolo, Carlos
AU - Vaucheret, Esteban
AU - Sedeño, Lucas
AU - Couto, Blas
AU - Kargieman, Lucila
AU - Baglivo, Fabricio
AU - Sigman, Mariano
AU - Chennu, Srivas
AU - Ibáñez, Agustín
AU - Rodríguez, Eugenio
AU - Bekinschtein, Tristan A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press.
PY - 2015/11
Y1 - 2015/11
N2 - Interoception, the perception of our body internal signals, plays a key role in maintaining homeostasis and guiding our behavior. Sometimes, we become aware of our body signals and use them in planning and strategic thinking. Here, we show behavioral and neural dissociations between learning to follow one's own heartbeat and metacognitive awareness of one's performance, in a heartbeat-tapping task performed before and after auditory feedback. The electroencephalography amplitude of the heartbeat-evoked potential in interoceptive learners, that is, participants whose accuracy of tapping to their heartbeat improved after auditory feedback, was higher compared with non-learners. However, an increase in gamma phase synchrony (30-45 Hz) after the heartbeat auditory feedbackwas present only in those participants showing agreement between objective interoceptive performance and metacognitive awareness. Source localization in a group of participants and direct cortical recordings in a single patient identified a network hub for interoceptive learning in the insular cortex. In summary, interoceptive learning may be mediated by the right insular response to the heartbeat, whereas metacognitive awareness of learning may be mediated by widespread cortical synchronization patterns.
AB - Interoception, the perception of our body internal signals, plays a key role in maintaining homeostasis and guiding our behavior. Sometimes, we become aware of our body signals and use them in planning and strategic thinking. Here, we show behavioral and neural dissociations between learning to follow one's own heartbeat and metacognitive awareness of one's performance, in a heartbeat-tapping task performed before and after auditory feedback. The electroencephalography amplitude of the heartbeat-evoked potential in interoceptive learners, that is, participants whose accuracy of tapping to their heartbeat improved after auditory feedback, was higher compared with non-learners. However, an increase in gamma phase synchrony (30-45 Hz) after the heartbeat auditory feedbackwas present only in those participants showing agreement between objective interoceptive performance and metacognitive awareness. Source localization in a group of participants and direct cortical recordings in a single patient identified a network hub for interoceptive learning in the insular cortex. In summary, interoceptive learning may be mediated by the right insular response to the heartbeat, whereas metacognitive awareness of learning may be mediated by widespread cortical synchronization patterns.
KW - Heartbeat-evoked potential
KW - Interoception
KW - Learning
KW - Metacognitive awareness
KW - Phase synchrony
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947459130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/cercor/bhv076
DO - 10.1093/cercor/bhv076
M3 - Article
C2 - 25899708
AN - SCOPUS:84947459130
SN - 1047-3211
VL - 25
SP - 4490
EP - 4503
JO - Cerebral Cortex
JF - Cerebral Cortex
IS - 11
ER -