Abandoned Places in the Digital Era: Spatial Roots of Disaffection and the Internet’s Role in Inclusion

Pedro Fierro, Patricio Navia, Patricio Aroca

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This book explores the spatial and contextual factors behind citizens' anger, frustration, and sense of abandonment, alongside the role of digital platforms in politically marginalized areas. It shifts the focus from voting geography to the geography of discontent, offering a new perspective on digital inequalities. The study addresses the complexities of "left-behind" places, recognizing that patterns of decline in developed countries differ from those in developing nations, where political and cultural dynamics play a key role. Using Chile’s Valparaíso region as a case study, the book applies its framework to a context characterized by a strong party system, robust institutions, and high Internet penetration. Chile’s recent political crisis, marked by widespread dissatisfaction, makes this analysis particularly relevant. Valparaíso, with its unique role as the host of the National Congress and as a focal point of the 2019 social uprising, serves as a microcosm for understanding the spatial dimensions of political discontent in digitally connected societies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSpringerBriefs in Regional Science
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Pages1-76
Number of pages76
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameSpringerBriefs in Regional Science
VolumePart F245
ISSN (Print)2192-0427
ISSN (Electronic)2192-0435

Keywords

  • Democratic divide
  • Digital inequalities
  • Geography of discontent
  • Latin America
  • Political Attitudes
  • Political disaffection
  • Political efficacy
  • Spatial inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Abandoned Places in the Digital Era: Spatial Roots of Disaffection and the Internet’s Role in Inclusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this